This article is right. Jussie
strongly implied that he was gay. but he never actually said that he was gay. I said this in another thread.
However, I hold a problem with this part:
Quote:
Smollett answered in a way that was best for him, but for those of us who have actually come out, we understand there’s a bit more to those two words than many of these headlines and stories have suggested.
|
I doubt anyone who is actually criticizing him is actually in his position, especially this writer. Considering that he came out to those who are the most important (his family and friends - inner circle), he has already truly come out. This part of the article is flawed because this person and those screaming and waving never actually had to come out to the public or world because of his or her public stature. So, to discredit the way he chose to finally expose his sexuality (yes, the writer said that he answered in the best way for him, but still went on to discredit his way of him "coming out") is funny in the very least. He isn't obligated to tell the world anything about his sexual preference. And again, the "why is it okay for straights to say they love women?" is so off base and nonsensical. There's no such thing as "coming out straight" nor is it seen as abnormal for a straight person to talk about their love life. It is taboo still for a gay person to openly discuss their love life without being critiqued by both sides - gay or straight. It's also taboo for us to have a gay black male entertainer. That's not the faults of gays. That's the standard in which everyone is held.
Whether or not he explicitly said or just implied, he has not come forward to say that his words were taken out of context. So as far as I'm concerned, it's a non-issue people are looking for to be something bigger than what it is. He's a gay man and it's known to those who have been keeping up. Plain and simple.