I couldn't be less interested, the first one was terrible.

I hate that this got away and 50 shades got a backlash when it should be the other way around.

Some of these are from the first one....

Same boring movie. Sorry, but this movie doesn't do anything for me. :/

I'm hard, so it works for me.

Both movies are terrible and only meant for horny straight women.

Agreed

I'll watch just for Channing. Gotta admit he was/is the only thing interesting... :|

I'm only here for Joe and Matt. The others can gtfo

The ONLY one i care about is Ellen's gardener, he got casted right?

Matt Bomer

I am as straight as a mechanical pencil and this does NOTHING for me. No kind of diversity either. And it looks so very try hard. They can keep it.

One movie was enough. A movie like this doesn't deserve a sequel.

Meh.

50 Shades wasn't terrible but given your ignorant logic, you would say something like that.

I feel like this is going to flop. Hard.

How sexist. Men get praised and adored for stripping and showing their bodies, but how dare a woman show a little bit of cleavage or wear something revealing.

I looked at the comments on Daily Mail where similar pics of this movie was shown, and all the comments said "they are so hot". But when a women is showing skin or is wearing something sexy, they are called tasteless, ****s, disgusting and other sexist things.

Women always gets slammed for the same thing men arent.

When will you realize that 50 Shades of Grey was bad because of the terrible production and not because a woman wore something revealing.. it the movie would have been good critics would have loved it BECAUSE a woman wore something revealing... this is still a sexist world were women should strip but men shouldn't.

Well 50 Shades made way way more bank, so I don't know why anyone would care.