Yes, if it says "go to the last post in the thread for an explanation" and there is no explanation that is just lazy. Supaspaz nearly always leaves an explanation and they're like the only one
Regarding the amount of dress threads closed yesterday, it was a really dumb decision. It's like this website wants revenue yet doesn't capitalise on situations like yesterday. People were visiting the forum to only not see us talking about it.
I always have to send help requests asking why threads are closed. For example my threads "Gay No More: The Story of Michael Glatze", "Large pet cat lives in the bathroom" and "Real-life Shrek" were all closed without explanation. My threads "Collecting knives" and "Draw Mohammed for a chance to win $10,000" were DELETED!
Regarding the amount of dress threads closed yesterday, it was a really dumb decision. It's like this website wants revenue yet doesn't capitalise on situations like yesterday. People were visiting the forum to only not see us talking about it.
If it is a thread that pretty much explains itself as to why it got closed, no. Otherwise, yes.
Yeah but so many times I have no idea why a thread got closed and theres no explanation in the last post. It really should be a requirement when locking threads, to explain in last post.
Just for clarification sake.
