Member Since: 10/14/2011
Posts: 15,451
|
Did Kelly C eat all her backing singers?-Katie Hopkins DRAGS
'Did she eat all of her backing singers?':
Katie Hopkins causes outrage on Twitter as she criticises Kelly Clarkson's weight
Quote:
While watching the American singer, 32, perform on The Graham Norton Show, the 40-year-old tweeted: 'Jesus, what happened to Kelly Clarkson? Did she eat all of her backing singers?'
The sharp tongued columnist also added: 'Happily I have wide-screen. #grahamnorton'.
Sticking up for Clarkson, many users on the micro-blogging site pointed out to Hopkins that Kelly had become a mother for the first time just eight months ago.
However this information only fuelled Katie's rant and she continued: 'Darling, if you had a baby a year ago, that is not baby weight. It is fat. Quit calling it cute names to make yourself feel better.'
As more people took to Clarkson's defence, the former Celebrity Big Brother contestant then wrote: 'Baby weight, puppy fat, muffin top. We're so weakwilled we have to make up cute names for fat.
'Babies, puppies, muffins. Nope. Just fat love'.
Unimpressed with Hopkins' jibes, one person tweeted: 'No, @KTHopkins - it is never ok to slate someone for their weight or appearance. It says much more about you than it does about them.'
While someone else commented: 'I think raising her child is more important than hitting the gym. Kind of like how tweeting mean things is for you.'
'@KTHopkins Thankfully Kelly Clarkson probably doesn't have a clue who you are. You're a nobody compared to her. And that's what matters', were the words of another Twitter user.
Following her tirade, on Saturday afternoon Hopkins safeguarded herself by asserting that she was free to say what she pleased on her social media profile.
She wrote: 'Let's remember boys and girls and haggard old bags, if you don't like what I say, you don't have to read it. My voice comes with choice.
'No one needs to agree with my views. Accepting we all think differently is the joy of life. Unless you are fat. Then clearly you're wrong.'
|
Source
|
|
|