I know it might seem Socratic if you peel away my logic and reasoning you can only conclude that its common sense and reckless to break the laws in your country and not expect to face the consequences.

I never said he should not have broken the law, or that the law was a good law, I said he should be aware of the consequences.

Sometimes laws need to be broken, to shed light on them in order for change to happen but you have to know the law will be enforced.

Why is it so hard to grasp this concept?