http://www.digitaltrends.com/game-re...r-1886-review/

Best. Review.

No wonder, they locked it at 30 fps and gave the laughable "it's more cinematic" argument. No, stupid dev, it's not "more cinematic", it's just jerkier. Movies don't require player interaction and games don't have cinema motion blur.

"60 fps changes the aesthetic of the game so we went for 30 instead" - Dana Jan, director of The Order: 1866

"I think we might have discovered the first true professional console peasant. "We're going for this filmic look". Bollocks. 30fps is not a design choice. It is a last resort when dealing with inferior hardware."- TotalBiscuit

The fact that the best PS4 games are remasters of TLOU and GTA.

ki

All these irrelevant european sites giving it 8s and 9s so transparent.

The sites that actually matter have been taking the game to task. Shame that PS4 owners will have to wait a little bit longer for a worthwhile exclusive.

When IGN gives something a great score you can ignore it because they're corporate shills, but when they give something a bad score it's worth looking into.

at least they are trying something new. im not here for the 84903489042890 zelda game.

the wii u fans can have mario party 20, Donkey kong 15 and mario kart 26.

Yes, when a site like IGN that basically operates on a 7-10 scale gives you a 6.5, you know you ****ed up.

Actually hilarious that you consider this game 'something new'.

the self drag

The Order 2000 and late is just another random generic shooter flooding the market. There's nothing new about it.

Watch it outsell Bayonetta in like 2 weeks though.