Well if this goes to a jury case and I were on the list of jurors I would keep voting not guilty until I got my way.
Murder is much but I understand him and if you were to see your child being sexually abused by a pedophile, who knows what you'd do.
And now he's gonna rot in prison and his daughter is basically fatherless.
Bye. This is why there are laws and he was in his right to beat his ass but why kill him, hand him over to the authorities and keep it moving, if his intentions were to protect his daughter being there for her while she grows up would serve better than rotting in prison.
!! What an idiot. Everyone in here is so selfish. "No pedos!!" like obviously, but this girl is now without her dad because he was too stupid / barbaric to control himself. Just a general rule of thumb: being around for your kids to grow up should be a priority. Not this 'omg Im a hero' act.
I don't think people in the general public should be allowed to kill pedophiles. I know many people could argue they deserve to die, and perhaps they're right, perhaps they're wrong, that's not the issue. The issue with this imo is that if members of the general public are legally allowed to kill pedophiles, then you'll get situations where someone who's simply suspected of being a pedophile might be killed when in fact they weren't one.
If a country decides that pedophiles should receive the death sentence, that's fine, but the killings should be left up to the Government or legal system or whatever. I don't think members of the general public can be trusted with this.
That lack of self control is troublesome. Beating the guy senseless and contacting officials thereafter is plenty. I don't think the people in this thread understand how serious homocide is, even in this case of child voyeurism.
That lack of self control is troublesome. Beating the guy senseless and contacting officials thereafter is plenty. I don't think the people in this thread understand how serious homocide is, even in this case of child voyeurism.
It's only serious because the law says so there's nothing morally wrong with what he did.
It's only serious because the law says so there's nothing morally wrong with what he did.
Morals are generally a subjective thing, hence the separation of church and state in the US. However, this man didn't pose an immediate threat to the girl, so his death goes unjustified. Proper action would have been additional reporting to officials to hopefully get him incarcerated. I don't know how the justice system would have worked in this case though.
I don't know how the justice system would have worked in this case though.
Well, it clearly didn't work before - it says he was already found to have child ****ography and somehow he's out on vacation! I would expect a life sentence at the very least!
He asked him to stop filming but the pedophile continued. IMO the father did the right thing. One less sicko in this world. Who knows what that pedophile could've done.
He asked him to stop filming but the pedophile continued. IMO the father did the right thing. One less sicko in this world. Who knows what that pedophile could've done.
Exactly... like, why wouldn't we execute pedos? it's like a rabid dog or an infectious mosquito... just nasty beings from the devil.
' act.
there's nothing morally wrong with what he did.