Originally posted by Goosey They shouldn't have to make a cake that will be used for purposes they don't approve of. That's all that needs to be said.

Originally posted by Goosey They shouldn't have to make a cake that will be used for purposes they don't approve of. That's all that needs to be said.

Great! Discrimination should be condemned in all of its forms. If they don't bake cakes for LGBT then they should advertise themselves as such and not call themselves an open business. You're running a bakery, not a church.

Incorrect, she offered baking the cake and give the client the frost so he could write whatever he wanted. Go and support the wonderful and humane Azucar Bakery.

Originally posted by Goosey They shouldn't have to make a cake that will be used for purposes they don't approve of. That's all that needs to be said.

Originally posted by Newt They discriminated against a couple, based on their sexuality, because they didn't want their cake eaten by lesbians? And you support the discrimination? That's all that needs to be said.

Originally posted by Vespertine The purpose of the cake is to be eaten.

Originally posted by Goosey I would have been smart and said "sorry we're out of ingredients"

Originally posted by Goosey I don't support them discriminating, I support their ability to do it without being fined this is a religious matter. Anyways if I was them I would have been smart and said "sorry we're out of ingredients" or something...

Originally posted by Newt Can you point out to me in which religion is baking a cake for homosexuals to eat, frowned upon and forbidden? This isn't an act of religion. This is an act of hate and ignorance disguised as religion to protect the naysayer. That should not be acceptable. And the courts have rightfully ruled it is not by fining them as an example

Originally posted by Goosey Nope they don't want to support a gay marriage, it goes against their religious and political views it's the same as if a Muslim bakery was asked to make a cake for some unbelievers' Christmas celebrations. They shouldn't have to if they don't want to.

Originally posted by Newt They're extrapolating "no cake 4 u" from a thousand year-old book with vague anti-same sex activity views. Discriminating in the name of religion (incorrectly, at that) is still discrimination! If you hand me a spade and tell me it's a heart because religion told you it was ok to call it a heart, it's still a spade. None of your arguments make sense. Your inability to think logically makes this fruitless. Bless your feeble mind

Originally posted by Goosey Oop resorting to insults I see so what if they discriminate, it's not a government business, it's a privately-owned operation.

Originally posted by Newt That's irrelevant. If individuals can't be trusted to act with respect and tact, the government should intervene. Slapping the private label on something means nothing; laws are already in place that intervene at the private level.

Originally posted by ks_dollar You are literally the gayest member in this thread.

Can anyone spot the oxymoron?

Meanwhile, let this be a lesson to those who think they don't have to abide by the law. Yes, show your kids you won't bow down. Show them you won't obey the law and they could lose the roof over their heads because of it. The absolute idiocy.

Except, in reality, with the publicity this case is getting I'm sure there will be some kind of fund set up and they'll be fully funded from all the Bible thumpers of the land.