Because that's how it always is most of the time. Chances are that next year whoever perform will beat her record and the person from the year after will do the same and so on.
But still congrats Katy. You did good.
There was one year when one performer failed to manage ratings higher than the year before them, i forgot who tho
They've always compared the peak during halftime to the average, but in Bey's case, the Hive is comparing numbers from different sources. Anyways, the number of viewers dipped right after too. Worst case (maybe ap calc student blade can confirm) she was at a local maximum, which was still higher than the average. Funny how no one called that out when Bruno or Madonna had the record.
Why the heck are people comparing AVERAGE to PEAK ?
So you are comparing the peak viewers during the Halftime show (I know u can't get average viewers during the halftime but still) , to the average viewers during the show ? Why ? You should compare peak to peak a.k.a 118.5M vs. 121M because this means that 3 more million tuned in just for the end of the game and they didn't tune in for the Halftime show..?
And yeah because Katy is the Queen of Radio Songs.
Supposedly overshadowed by Tom Brady, her guests, and the shark
Except she was overshadowed by Tom Brady and that final pick. There is no denying it. Look at how Tom Brady was higher on Google trends that Monday over Katy despite being local. I am not even trying to take away from katy because I believe she could have pulled in more people than Bey regardless.
Chances are that next year whoever perform will beat her record and the person from the year after will do the same and so on.
but still) , to the average viewers during the show ? Why ? You should compare peak to peak a.k.a 118.5M vs. 121M because this means that 3 more million tuned in just for the end of the game and they didn't tune in for the Halftime show..?
