I got some surprised reactions when I stated 1989 is the biggest pop era of the 2010s so far, but how can it be argued? The only bigger era of the 2010s was 21, and whether you consider 21 a pop era in the same vein as 1989 is up to you entirely.
I'm calling 1989 the biggest pop era because of its "poppier" sounds, beats, and style of music, which differs significantly from 21.
Do you agree?
Quote:
1) The sales are absolutely massive. The album will most likely pass 10 M sales WW, which is absolutely incredible in the 2010s.
2) Several more hits will be produced from the album within the next year or so. Style, Bad Blood & Wildest Dreams have all shown promising pre-release sales, streams, and overall interest. Shake It Off & Blank Space were already humongous hits. It's yet to be known how many, if any, of her future singles will go #1, but it's almost a guarantee they'll be Top 10 hits unless they're tragically mishandled. No tour videos this time!
3) Back to album sales, let's talk specifically about the US. 1989 is already Top 10 in overall album sales for the decade, and it's dangerously close to snatching the #2 spot only behind Adele. It should be there within the next 6 months, and the fact that it did this in such a short amount of time is remarkable.
4) The era has been a pop culture moment. Taylor is inescapable right now. This isn't only because of her marketers, but it's also because people are truly interested in her every move. She's essentially become untouchable-seeming and idolized - a sign of popstar making big impressions on people.
|