Sure. If you are not flying a Malaysian owned airline. 3 in under one year is way too much. If it were Delta or American Airlines people would be revolting.
Before 2014 Malaysia Airlines or Air Asia never had a crash since 1977. Now they just having one after the other. Something is going on.
It's not confirmed (the black boxes will tell the full story), but it's likely since they were battling severe weather.
This whole incident is starting to sound similar to the Air France 447 flight from 2009.
would be so much kinder to the people on the flight if it was just shot out of the air, like the other plane this year no suffering, does anyone know how long it takes for a plane to fall 35k?
Yeah this is kind of similar to the AF447 flight.
And the flight that crashed into Hudson river was gliding not freefalling (it's still amazing though, to be able to land in water and not break up).
would be so much kinder to the people on the flight if it was just shot out of the air, like the other plane this year no suffering, does anyone know how long it takes for a plane to fall 35k?
Flight 447 went into a stall and lasted 3 min 30 seconds. There is a video on youtube with recording of their last moments.
And that picture (which is a TOTAL violation) I saw. I definitely did not intend on seeing it. The poor person was ALL WHITE, like block white. I am upset for all the relatives, friends and acquiantances of the victim.
Yes, 3 crashes with no survivors in ONE year from companies all related to one country is sure to be very rare...
IDK if you are being sarcastic but it really is rare and odd. If another one goes down soon investigations need to be held and all there stuff shut down. It's either conspiracy or very bad mechanics and training.
AirAsia didn’t have permission to fly from Surabaya to Singapore on the Sunday morning that flight QZ8501 crashed into the Java Sea.
Indonesia's transport ministry said the plane had been flying on an 'unauthorised schedule' when it crashed, and the airliner has now been suspended from flying the route from the city of Surabaya to Singapore.
Initially they only had permission to operate the route on certain weekdays, Sunday was not one of them. Recently they were granted authority to fly the route daily, however they hadn't received the actual signed document yet saying so when QZ8501 crashed. That's all this is from what I understood.
Pretty much, it's the local airports in Malaysia's fault for allow the planes to fly during those conditions and not having the proper technology equipped to the planes to track it.
Pretty much, it's the local airports in Malaysia's fault for allow the planes to fly during those conditions and not having the proper technology equipped to the planes to track it.
No. It was not generally unsafe to fly, hence why all other airplanes flying at the time reached their destination safely.
Initially they only had permission to operate the route on certain weekdays, Sunday was not one of them. Recently they were granted authority to fly the route daily, however they hadn't received the actual signed document yet saying so when QZ8501 crashed. That's all this is from what I understood.
Oh, so more a red tape / paperwork issue than an actual breach of safety. Why didn't air traffic control correct them tho? All these things that don't add up.....
Quote:
Originally posted by Jezang Looz
Pretty much, it's the local airports in Malaysia's fault for allow the planes to fly during those conditions and not having the proper technology equipped to the planes to track it.
