The audacity of someone who is not a victim of racism, or is apart of the majority, to try to tell someone else how they should feel and how they should act, or try to discredit that person's experience. Disgusting.

I am so fed up of seeing her awful, wrong, hateful posts. They make NO sense, and she has just outed herself as a racist homophobe, so good for ha I suppose

She realized she has no career and no one checks for her, and it's sad that even after this exposure she'll still never be as talented or as well-liked or as famous as an artist she ridicules and bullies for no reason. Poor ha. What a sad position to be in.

Which definition would you prefer I use? One you have made that is convenient to your argument?
When people talk about racism against whites, they mean the dictionary one

Book smarts do not equal life knowledge. Anyone can study hard enough and do well on a test.

This.

That's not true though.

She's 100% right on this.

That's not true. I know people who study their asses off and get C's. I put in minimum effort and pull A's. Don't try to shade my intelligence. Seriously.

Also, why I pointed out that I have made (what I consider) a well written, thought out reply to PURELY Azealia's points which not one of you will reply to.

when azealia uses the phrase white people, she's not talking about individual white people, but whiteness as a social construct.

if you are a white person who genuinely cares about working against racism, you wouldn't be up in here crying about 'racism against whites'.

You're missing the point. Being able to score well on a test is irrelevant to whether someone understands racism or Azealia's points. Do you think racist politicians are stupid? Many of them are graduates of some of the nation's top schools. The point is just because you can regurgitate answers it does not mean that you are qualified to tell someone that their points are invalid because that's their experience. Have you lived in a minority's shoes? Do you know how it feels to be discriminated against on a broader level? Studying for a college entrance exam is not going to answer that.

You know, she's actually got a valid point this rant. "But white people face racism, too." is used so many times to try and shade down valid discussions.

When Azealia is talking about "white people" she is talking about all "white people." As a whole. So yes, she IS referring to society and not an individual person, I'm not an idiot. However, that does not change the fact she very clearly is lumping every white person together as a whole. That's where the issue comes from. She's acting as though all white people are racist bigots who want to set back blacks at every turn. That's not true. If she wanted to say SOCIETY, she would say SOCIETY. Not white people. It's not hard.

She's also using the wrong definition of racism for the topic she's attacking. No one is convinced U.S. society is against whites. When people say "racism against whites," we mean personal, individual racism from one person towards them (AKA the dictionary definition)

I fail to see your point that I don't "genuinely care". If I care about racism against blacks, why would I care any less than racism against whites, Asians, Latinos, or any other racial group? Blacks are not more important than any of those groups (likewise, none of those groups are more important than blacks) Racism against all types upsets me equally, the only factor effecting how much it upsets me being how bad the racism it is (for example, keeping blacks as slaves is far more offensive than making a racist stereotype about them, but keeping blacks as slaves is equally as wrong as keeping Asians, Latnios, whites, etc. as slaves would be)

wow it's like she's infected ya'll with her own delusion

It's just impossible discussing these kinds of things with people like you, who insist on avoiding the discussion of race and racism outside the mainstream.

Literally no one thinks all white people are the same. When people say 'whites' or 'white people' they aren't lumping every single white person on the planet together. They are talking about whiteness, the ideology behind white supremacy, which results in racism. Whiteness is not exclusive to white people, people of color can buy into whiteness, too (tons of black people believe that black slang is not 'proper english', for example). However, at the end of the day, whiteness comes from white people, and is mainly practiced by white people. That is an inescapable fact, and to get angry at Azealia for her usage of 'white people' is completely ignoring that fact. It also exposes your misplaced concern - that you're worried at all about poor white people being generalized than actual racism people of color face.

There's no such thing as reverse racism, and there is no such thing as racism against whites. Racism in the real world is a system that maintains a racial hierarchy (white people at the top, everyone else below). A black man calling a white man a cracker is not an example of racism. It does nothing to perpetuate a system where white people are on top. It's certainly a disrespectful comment, but it's not racism.

What Azealia is getting at is that time and again any time whiteness is put under scrutiny, white people cry out that they are the target of racism. From that point on, things are pointless; the discussion now has to some how accommodate for white sensibilities. You can't do that while critically discussing about racism.

wow it's like you know nothing about how race/racism works