Originally posted by YourMadGesty That foo doesn't live in no fan African country; he lives in the Wash D.C. area. Lying to make Janet look more relevant and bigger.

Originally posted by T.C Oh the irony It clearly says on the single cover it's a duet It was even written by Janet's producers.

The difference being that the only ones that claim Janet is the "most influential female act" are her (deluded) stans, contrary to mostly everyone who gives credit to Madonna as the biggest, most successful and most impactful female act ever, even her haters. Plus facts, official sources, actual evidence & media side with Madonna, sorry.

Also, the fact that you keep tabs on me is so creepy. But you do you.

Keep looking for those African inexistent charts, one more to catch up with Céline.



Are you sure it's only Europe tho? Cause the evidence shown in the OP is quite conclusive. The one you deemed as not global having 5x more songs that hit top 10 in more than six countries around the world than the one you said is (more) global because she's known in your African country is quite laughable and that's only peaks, but then again you do you.

Originally posted by Rolland Are you sure it's only Europe tho? Cause the evidence shown in the OP is quite conclusive. The one you deemed as not global having 5x more songs that hit top 10 in more than six countries around the world that the one you said is (more) global because she's known in your African country is quite laughable and that's only peaks, but then again you do you. [/CENTER]

Originally posted by Lately 1814 Your perception of "global" is just as skewed as Brit Bot's perception of "slaying the stage". There is no such thing as a "global" hit because every song is not popular in every country in the world. There is also no such thing as being "global" either for the same aforementioned reasoning. The OP is very conclusive for face value, but through critical analysis, it's clear why Madonna is in the lead. I'm assuming you can think critically and understand why, Socrates?

If the word global bothers you that much then we can say: having a prominent performance/presence across multiple countries/markets around the world. Same criteria could apply for recorded material, tours, media presence, etc.

Is that ok for you?

And enlighten me, I wanna read the new excuses.



Btw, at Janet stans reporting my thread. This wasn't even done with her in mind, I've done threads like this one before.

Originally posted by Rolland If the word global bothers you that much then we can say: having a prominent performance/presence across multiple countries/markets around the world. Same criteria could apply for recorded material, tours, media presence, etc. Is that ok for you? And enlighten me, I wanna read the new excuses. Btw, at Janet stans reporting my thread. This wasn't even done with her in mind, I've done threads like this one before.

Originally posted by Rolland If the word global bothers you that much then we can say: having a prominent performance/presence across multiple countries/markets around the world. Same criteria could apply for recorded material, tours, media presence, etc. Is that ok for you? And enlighten me, I wanna read the new excuses. Btw, at Janet stans reporting my thread. This wasn't even done with her in mind, I've done threads like this one before.

That wouldn't be easy for me because my fave peaked in the 70s and 80s, when what's available now wasn't available then. I'm not afraid to admit many artists are more commercially successful than Him, but His songs classics are arguably more well known.