In order for it have been impact, it would have to be something that's associated with Britney. and dubstep definitely isn't associated with Britney. If it was so impactful, wouldn't the song be remembered?
Most of those iTunes positions are not that good (barely selling a few copies) and Beyoncé was released more recently. And if HIAM isn't a hit then how is Drunk In Love one?
Why isn't HIAM (or any other Britney single actually) charting on iTunes if it was such a major hit? Even RTW is charting. Your post doesn't make sense at all, tbh.
In order for it have been impact, it would have to be something that's associated with Britney. and dubstep definitely isn't associated with Britney. If it was so impactful, wouldn't the song be remembered?
The album you're looking for is 2007's Blackout which Rihanna shamelessly ripped off. See: Freakshow.
Why isn't HIAM (or any other Britney single actually) charting on iTunes if it was such a major hit? Even RTW is charting. Your post doesn't make any sense at all, tbh.
Didnt hbo just air weekly some performances of her new tour?
You're right I misread it. WB sold about double of DIL. But still, as I said, WB was a first single when no one had the song or any other song from the album.
HIAM wasn't a hit because of its sales? But DIL was a hit while it only managed to sneak into the top 10 thanks to the streaming following the buzz after Grammy?
You're right I misread it. WB sold about double of DIL. But still, as I said, WB was a first single when no one had the song or any other song from the album.
More like wb triple dil first week sales.anyway..
Still dil had 140m airplay n u said it didnt have payola ! Cuz the hive was buying the album and wasnt focused on the singles..but it was focused on requesting the song?..
