Originally posted by Scheiße.

Originally posted by BlueTimberwolf No, it says something about both. If his music is good enough, why not market it on its merits?

Originally posted by collin I don't think that what Nick is doing is a bad thing, I do find it to be progressive tbh

Isn't it our fault as the gay community for falling for it though?
Nick can do whatever he wants, we're the fools for taking it.
You can't 'blame' someone for having a selling strategy.

Originally posted by Adonis Agree. It's nice to see straight people pandering to the gays for a change...rather than just taking it for granted that we should just give our dollars to them without them working hard for it.

Since when is showing more skin considered hard work?

Despite the fact that it is a considerably successful marketing strategy, it does undermine homosexuals as being more sexually focal.
This guy literally uses sex as a weapon and gets away w/ it due to his looks

Originally posted by Boniqua While it is not necessarily harmful to "pander" to the gays, you can't help but sit back and speculate over the sincerity of it all. The same goes for the females, too. Gaga had her fair share of people finding her support exploitative during the BTW era.

This is still going on?

Originally posted by NLX I kind of understand why he would feel some type of way. Maybe if he was a bit more masculine things would work out in his favor.

someone is bothered that a powerful straight male with enough cinfidence in his sexuality can play with gays and that gays are buying it...