Kim Kardashin was paid a grand total of $0.00 to pose naked
Quote:
Another common question regarding her racy photo shoot: Just how much did Paper magazine pay her to go full-frontal for the issue? And the answer to that interesting little tidbit will surely surprise you.
Many may assume that the mag forked over a huge chunk of cash to get the Internet-breaking snapshot (understandbly so), but E! News learns that's not the case. Whatever figure you're guessing in your head is probably not correct.
So how much are we talking here? This much: Zero. Zip. Zilch. Nada. Yeah, seriously, Kim didn't get a cent for her naked pics.
She probably payed Paper a whopping amount of money to say she did it for nothing. I actually love Kim Kardashian, but no one walks out of a photoshoot empty handed, especially not when it's Kim Kardashian and there's nudity involved.
Well she's a fool because everyone is mocking the hell out of her and this shoot has done her no favors. Damn, she could have at least gotten a check for the humiliation.
"She was very excited to work with French photographer Jean-Paul Goude. Paper has never paid anyone to be on its cover."
Okay there it is. And I mean, it's Kim. So between Paper not paying for covers (apparently ) and the fact that it's ****ing Jean-Paul Goude shooting—hell, I'd do the same.
It makes sense since that cover is gonna make her relevant and super famous, people will talk about her and see her show. That how she's making money out of that cover.
) and the fact that it's ****ing Jean-Paul Goude shooting—hell, I'd do the same.