I know quite a few people who would not identify as any of the above, so yes.

yes

When some people say I'm pansexual it's like, kool you're a hipster bisexual. I'm not 100% sure about asexuality as a natural sexuality as it doesn't make sense biologically

I believe humans complicate sexuality, it's not as complex as people think it's all biological

I can't say I really understand those sexualities so who am I to determine whether they're 'real' or not. Let people label themselves however they want.

I can see people that don't like sex or see attraction in anyone, but I think these odd hybrids and mutations of bisexuality make no sense.


But effie593 said who am I to say if they are real or not. So it is whatever for me.

I don't, but people should be allowed to call themselves whatever they want

Yes. People may say some of these sexualities or preferences are stupid and silly but you can't truly know how a person feels about sex unless you are that person.

No, this girl told me was a 'pansexual' and I said "bisexual, then?" and she's like "no..." i was like

Absence of evidence isn't the evidence of absence

You're grossly oversimplifying the way science views biology. Failure to reject the null hypothesis doesn't mean that it isn't possible or relevant to biological systems. Also, not to pathologize asexuality since I don't know anything about it, but there are various hypothesis that view certain disorders as dysfunctions of typical framework. maybe asexuality is just a dysfunction of the biology of sexual attraction

I understand pansexuality but what annoys me is when pansexuals explain their sexuality and then people reply "so basically you're bisexual?" and then the pansexual person gets mad Like you have to admit that they are pretty similar and you can't get mad at people for not understanding the difference just because you suck at explaining ****

I don't know what demosexual and arisexual are