| |
Celeb News: Dr Lukes Lawyer responds
ATRL Contributor
Member Since: 8/19/2013
Posts: 56,234
|
From a completely unbiased point of view, Luke is already losing this. Kesha's team have not come up with the "evidence" yet because now is not the right time to do so. Everything we've "seen" so far wasn't even meant for public eyes. If there is truth to Kesha's attorney's claims that they have evidence, this is good.
Whereas Luke's team seem to be taking a less direct approach; they're giving lots of info but nothing is relevant. "I haven't seen Kesha in years," doesn't mean that the abuse didn't occur between 2005-2012. Why has she been staying away from him? It's literally an irrelevant comment in regards to, "I couldn't have abused her when she was 18 because I haven't seen her in years."
The facts are, if Luke didn't abuse Kesha, he'd be able to state such and be able to provide evidence. Luke's side hasn't ONCE said, "Luke has not ever sexually harrassed Kesha nor limited her creative rights, and we have proof of this," whereas Kesha's team at least claim to have proof for their case.
There simply isn't any evidence that Luke DIDN'T do these things, because he did. 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 10/1/2011
Posts: 19,016
|
Plus idk why he's so stubborn. Just let her go. She obviously hates your guts, how would you make good music together?
Him wanting to milk Kesha out this long really speaks to how controlling he is over her career and the claims make sense tbh.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 10/1/2011
Posts: 19,016
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Sam Jay
From a completely unbiased point of view, Luke is already losing this. Kesha's team have not come up with the "evidence" yet because now is not the right time to do so. Everything we've "seen" so far wasn't even meant for public eyes. If there is truth to Kesha's attorney's claims that they have evidence, this is good.
Whereas Luke's team seem to be taking a less direct approach; they're giving lots of info but nothing is relevant. "I haven't seen Kesha in years," doesn't mean that the abuse didn't occur between 2005-2012. Why has she been staying away from him? It's literally an irrelevant comment in regards to "I couldn't have abused her when she was 18 because I haven't seen her in years."
The facts are, if Luke didn't abuse Kesha, he'd be able to state such and be able to provide evidence. Luke's side hasn't ONCE said, "Luke has not every sexually harrassed Kesha nor limited her creative rights, and we have proof of this," whereas Kesha's team at least claim to have proof for their case.
There simply isn't any evidence that Luke DIDN'T do these things, because he did. |
I agree with the first half of your post but as someone else said,we have to wait for the evidence. They're not gonna show it to TMZ or anything. 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 11,383
|
Quote:
|
the lawsuit filed against her client is a "spectacular and outrageous fiction that will go down in flames."
|
oop
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 11,383
|
Kesha is SERVING on that pic though
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 6/25/2012
Posts: 41,860
|
Quote:
Originally posted by VyktorJonas
Kesha is SERVING on that pic though |
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 11/18/2008
Posts: 60,607
|
Hmm years as in 2012? For warrior?
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 4/4/2014
Posts: 1,474
|
How much sexual assault is happening between Dr. Luke & his lawyer to make his lawyer speak on his behalf at the moment? 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/31/2012
Posts: 13,110
|
I don't doubt that Ke$ha and Luke slept together, but I have a lot of doubts about the drugging part. Imo, it seems more like some desperate mud flinging from Team K$ to get out of her contract
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/19/2013
Posts: 32,982
|
Quote:
|
hasn't seen the TiK ToK star in years.
|
Thank God. I was worried he was molesting her when she wasn't a young, vulnerable woman. That really squelches my worrying. 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/3/2011
Posts: 23,567
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Sam Jay
The facts are, if Luke didn't abuse Kesha, he'd be able to state such and be able to provide evidence.
There simply isn't any evidence that Luke DIDN'T do these things, because he did. |
No offense, but these words seems at odds with reason and the entire spirit of the American criminal justice system.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 7/21/2009
Posts: 6,559
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Sam Jay
From a completely unbiased point of view, Luke is already losing this. Kesha's team have not come up with the "evidence" yet because now is not the right time to do so. Everything we've "seen" so far wasn't even meant for public eyes. If there is truth to Kesha's attorney's claims that they have evidence, this is good.
Whereas Luke's team seem to be taking a less direct approach; they're giving lots of info but nothing is relevant. "I haven't seen Kesha in years," doesn't mean that the abuse didn't occur between 2005-2012. Why has she been staying away from him? It's literally an irrelevant comment in regards to, "I couldn't have abused her when she was 18 because I haven't seen her in years."
The facts are, if Luke didn't abuse Kesha, he'd be able to state such and be able to provide evidence. Luke's side hasn't ONCE said, "Luke has not ever sexually harrassed Kesha nor limited her creative rights, and we have proof of this," whereas Kesha's team at least claim to have proof for their case.
There simply isn't any evidence that Luke DIDN'T do these things, because he did. |
Stupid as ****. So, if someone claims you did something to them years ago and throughout a certain time, YOU need to prove you did not do it? How? Sorry, darling, but the accuser needs to bring proof and as long as there is doubt left, the accused is INNOCENT. Sorry to break it to you.
edit: how exactly do you think anybody could prove in such a case that he did not do anything? Video tape? Laughable.
They have provided proof that the accusers tried to use their claims to get money and out of a contract.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/2/2014
Posts: 1,601
|
I'm not buying he hasn't seem her in years. Like do you think we're dumb?
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/2/2014
Posts: 4,837
|
Oh boy... His defense is so poor, this is ridiculous....
His lawyer is doing him any good tbh.
So he haven't seen Kesha "in years" hum well ok.... maybe for about two years, since Warrior was released... AND SO WHAT ? What does it prove ? Luke doesn't adopt the right strategy here. He sinks himself day by day...
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 4/4/2014
Posts: 4,690
|
The lawyer saying exactly what lawyer's always say regardless of the truth. Must suck sticking up for blatant criminals. 
Quote:
Originally posted by Dollas n Diamonds
|
LITERALLY this.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 10/12/2010
Posts: 9,881
|
How can he not seen her in years when he's her producer/boss/whatever else he might be.
That's ********.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 2/13/2012
Posts: 62,082
|
Why is it the same cycle of like 3 people siding with Luke in all these threads?
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 9/4/2012
Posts: 23,263
|
Quote:
|
"This kind of cynical grandstanding in which false claims of abuse are used as a negotiating tactic insults real victims," Lepera added.
|
Not saying I think they are false, but this is very true.
|
|
|
|
ATRL Contributor
Member Since: 8/19/2013
Posts: 56,234
|
Quote:
Originally posted by h.u.r.r.i.c.a.n.e
I agree with the first half of your post but as someone else said,we have to wait for the evidence. They're not gonna show it to TMZ or anything. |
Yes, we will. But at least Kesha is claiming to have evidence, Luke is not and is instead taking an offence approach by trying to discredit Kesha rather than taking a defensive approach by actually proving that he didn't sexually assault her or restrict her creative involvement with her own music. That's suspicious.
Quote:
Originally posted by RobynYoBank
No offense, but these words seems at odds with reason and the entire spirit of the American criminal justice system.
|
How so? If Luke had evidence that he didn't sexually assault her, why would he not use it? Plus, this is a civil case, not a criminal one.
Quote:
Originally posted by STMG23
Stupid as ****. So, if someone claims you did something to them years ago and throughout a certain time, YOU need to prove you did not do it? How? Sorry, darling, but the accuser needs to bring proof and as long as there is doubt left, the accused is INNOCENT. Sorry to break it to you.
edit: how exactly do you think anybody could prove in such a case that he did not do anything? Video tape? Laughable.
They have provided proof that the accusers tried to use their claims to get money and out of a contract.
|
Nothing I said was "stupid as ****". And yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. It's called an alibi. I'm sure you've heard of that. If Luke had an alibi that would hold up in court that would prove that he definitely could not have been intimately involved with Kesha during the first years of her being signed to his contract against Kesha's will, why not come forth with the evidence for THAT, instead of trying to make Kesha out to look like a liar by saying, "her mother wore a penis costume once!!!"
Luke's defence so far has been weak as piss and his way about things so far has been fishy to say the least. If Luke was innocent, he wouldn't need to resort to any of this tricks and slander tactics.
|
|
|
|
ATRL Contributor
Member Since: 8/19/2013
Posts: 56,234
|
Quote:
Originally posted by STMG23
They have provided proof that the accusers tried to use their claims to get money and out of a contract.
|
Missed this part. This is not true. A letter from Pebe (Kesha's mother) to Luke leaked addressing the situation, which was sent one year ago. If anything, this only helps support Kesha's case more, showing that it wasn't something that was thrown together or made up within the last 6-8 months since Kesha left rehab.
Money was never what Kesha was after. Kesha simply wanted out of her contract, and didn't want it to have to get as messy as it did. Kesha wanted out of her contract because he was abusive towards her. He obviously denied her requests yet again, which is why this is now a legal matter. Luke keeping Kesha signed despite her desire to leave and will to keep her is proof of this abusive nature.
Either way you spin this situation, Luke is the dick that wouldn't let Kesha out of her contract, and Kesha doesn't want out for money or anything like that, she's simply tired of working with the man who raped, abused and assaulted her for almost a decade.
|
|
|
|
|
|
