How would you feel if the "fading popstar" got a #1 with a jazz album after trying to drag her with hundreds of laughing smilies and dumb predictions, all for it to backfire on you, again?
Am surprised Tony sold less this time. Not sure who's to blame.
Clearly, your single-digit IQ.
Quote:
Originally posted by retromaury
Tony always does those numbers, in fact his last album opened with bigger numbers
So having Gaga attached to the project didn't cause the album to debut at number 1, if anything it hurt his sales
Tony always does those numbers, in fact his last album opened with bigger numbers
So having Gaga attached to the project didn't cause the album to debut at number 1, if anything it hurt his sales
Quote:
Originally posted by toshibatoshiba
Am surprised Tony sold less this time. Not sure who's to blame.
Quote:
Originally posted by Tutankhamun
Because Tony's last album sold more? He lost 40k of sales due to the inclusion of Gaga in his album, clearly proving that Gaga has a negative fanbase at this point which is very alarming.
Quote:
Originally posted by BPD
Not really sure what the big deal is about... Tony always opens with great numbers. This time Gaga is just along for the ride.
The last time Tony release a collab album with another artist was in 2002, with k.d lang. It managed to peak at #41. Please stop talking out of your asses, people.
3 years ago she sold 1 million in one week, making an album tops the chart is likely expectable I guess
and there are no major competitors booming at the moment
The last time Tony release a collab album with another artist was in 2002, with k.d lang. It managed to peak at #41. Please stop talking out of your asses, people.
Expose it!
certain posters are having meltdowns because Gaga got her **** together. We are not in ARTPOP era anymore, Little Microscopes. Get used to the slayage.
I was generously expecting 80k max. The improvement on Tony's recent receipts and the fact it's only his second #1 seems to be slipping from these girls' minds as they punch the keyboard in frustration.
Because Tony's last album sold more? He lost 40k of sales due to the inclusion of Gaga in his album, clearly proving that Gaga has a negative fanbase at this point which is very alarming.
certain posters are having meltdowns because Gaga got her **** together. We are not in ARTPOP era anymore, Little Microscopes. Get used to the slayage.
Screaming at little microscopes!
The SLAYAGE is here, #1 albums with obscure genres and mismatched pairings - the power of Gaga is BACK! (let's not forget the artRave is still smashing stadiums worldwide - DEAL )
If selling 127k copies first week then tumbling down the charts is your definition of a triumphant success, then congratulations.
*131k
Of course it is. Why wouldn't it be a triumphant success? How many popstars are ableto do the same with a JAZZ album, especially come after an underperforming era?
Because Tony's last album sold more? He lost 40k of sales due to the inclusion of Gaga in his album, clearly proving that Gaga has a negative fanbase at this point which is very alarming.
Tony always does those numbers, in fact his last album opened with bigger numbers
So having Gaga attached to the project didn't cause the album to debut at number 1, if anything it hurt his sales
Always? Where are your receipts? His last album featured Gaga and so many others as well. What's your point? Cheek to cheek's sales are good. Deal with it.
I just did some numbers and if we take go back to 2011 with sales (this year alone the sales are down by 14% compared to 2013).
Being in 2011 this album would have sold 194082 copies. Now I dunno about you for for a genre that hasn't been touched in ages, talking about mainstream, that doesn't seem too shabby
(I am not taking into account her status in 2011 compared to now, back then it would have sold probably more due to her popularity).
)
We are not in ARTPOP era anymore, Little Microscopes. Get used to the slayage. 
ch have you forgot katy perry's lead pop single part of me so easily?
Jazz and Pop Legend