| |
Single: Katy Perry - "This Is How We Do"
Member Since: 10/21/2011
Posts: 6,530
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Reb'l Rêveur
Katy, ha back-to-back streaming smasha! Watch Roar and DH pass that 2nd - 6th omv easily! QUEEN! 
|
She will be top by the end of the year 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 4/27/2010
Posts: 1,160
|
Officially team WOA. I love "Legendary Lovers," and I get why other people do, but after spending time trying and failing to make it more mainstream friendly, I feel the impending third mid-hit in my gut. Simply put, with casual fans/non-fans, "Walking On Air" is either "amazing" or "a great ode to the early 90s," while "Legendary Lovers" is either "amazing" or "no." Singles aren't about pleasing fans, they're about selling albums (or singles, at this point).
Even though "Legendary Lovers" is a gillion times better than this song, I just don't think it's going to click with enough people when they hear it on the radio as is or with minor tweaks. I'll happily eat my words, but I thought this and "Unconditionally" were doomed from the start.
I'd be fine with "It Takes Two," also. It's a bit late to be jumping on the fun. bandwagon, but if it's what they compromise on, I think it'd be an easy radio hit.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 595
|
Quote:
Originally posted by goldsoundz
Officially team WOA. I love "Legendary Lovers," and I get why other people do, but after spending time trying and failing to make it more mainstream friendly, I feel the impending third mid-hit in my gut. Simply put, with casual fans/non-fans, "Walking On Air" is either "amazing" or "a great ode to the early 90s," while "Legendary Lovers" is either "amazing" or "no." Singles aren't about pleasing fans, they're about selling albums (or singles, at this point).
Even though "Legendary Lovers" is a gillion times better than this song, I just don't think it's going to click with enough people when they hear it on the radio as is or with minor tweaks. I'll happily eat my words, but I thought this and "Unconditionally" were doomed from the start.
I'd be fine with "It Takes Two," also. It's a bit late to be jumping on the fun. bandwagon, but if it's what they compromise on, I think it'd be an easy radio hit.
|
+10 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/2/2014
Posts: 8,759
|
Quote:
Originally posted by lousaysthings
I pressed the WOA or LL question to my parents and they both said WOA should be the next single  My Dad even said WOA should've been released when I told him Birthday was being released 
Nonetheless, Capital FM have beeb supporting TIHWD a fair bit and it's been added (in dodgy cover form) to my work's in-store radio playlist 
|
would your parents lie?
Quote:
Originally posted by KatyLegendperry
Walking on Air's first birthday is on Tuesday
Perhaps she will celebrate its birthday by announcing it as the next single? 
|
Happy early birthday WOA...i hope you are ready to smash the worldwide charts!
|
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 8/17/2013
Posts: 1,814
|
Hi GOLDSOundz I JUST WANT TO SAY THANK YOU FOR BEING BORN AND FOR HAVING SUCH GREAT HEART and secretive. Thank you kindly
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 10/1/2011
Posts: 19,016
|
Quote:
Originally posted by goldsoundz
I'd be fine with "It Takes Two," also. It's a bit late to be jumping on the fun. bandwagon, but if it's what they compromise on, I think it'd be an easy radio hit.
|
Gorrlllllll ITT is so much better than anything fun. has ever put out. I'd compare it more to Emeli Sande (she co-wrote it after all).
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/2/2014
Posts: 15,009
|
Quote:
Originally posted by goldsoundz
Officially team WOA. I love "Legendary Lovers," and I get why other people do, but after spending time trying and failing to make it more mainstream friendly, I feel the impending third mid-hit in my gut. Simply put, with casual fans/non-fans, "Walking On Air" is either "amazing" or "a great ode to the early 90s," while "Legendary Lovers" is either "amazing" or "no." Singles aren't about pleasing fans, they're about selling albums (or singles, at this point).
Even though "Legendary Lovers" is a gillion times better than this song, I just don't think it's going to click with enough people when they hear it on the radio as is or with minor tweaks. I'll happily eat my words, but I thought this and "Unconditionally" were doomed from the start.
I'd be fine with "It Takes Two," also. It's a bit late to be jumping on the fun. bandwagon, but if it's what they compromise on, I think it'd be an easy radio hit.
|
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/2/2014
Posts: 8,759
|
Quote:
Originally posted by goldsoundz
Officially team WOA. I love "Legendary Lovers," and I get why other people do, but after spending time trying and failing to make it more mainstream friendly, I feel the impending third mid-hit in my gut. Simply put, with casual fans/non-fans, "Walking On Air" is either "amazing" or "a great ode to the early 90s," while "Legendary Lovers" is either "amazing" or "no." Singles aren't about pleasing fans, they're about selling albums (or singles, at this point).
Even though "Legendary Lovers" is a gillion times better than this song, I just don't think it's going to click with enough people when they hear it on the radio as is or with minor tweaks. I'll happily eat my words, but I thought this and "Unconditionally" were doomed from the start.
I'd be fine with "It Takes Two," also. It's a bit late to be jumping on the fun. bandwagon, but if it's what they compromise on, I think it'd be an easy radio hit.
|
glad you saw the light!
6th single WOA
7th single ITT
and i would be the happiest person in the world
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/20/2011
Posts: 18,654
|
Quote:
Originally posted by goldsoundz
Officially team WOA. I love "Legendary Lovers," and I get why other people do, but after spending time trying and failing to make it more mainstream friendly, I feel the impending third mid-hit in my gut. Simply put, with casual fans/non-fans, "Walking On Air" is either "amazing" or "a great ode to the early 90s," while "Legendary Lovers" is either "amazing" or "no." Singles aren't about pleasing fans, they're about selling albums (or singles, at this point).
Even though "Legendary Lovers" is a gillion times better than this song, I just don't think it's going to click with enough people when they hear it on the radio as is or with minor tweaks. I'll happily eat my words, but I thought this and "Unconditionally" were doomed from the start.
I'd be fine with "It Takes Two," also. It's a bit late to be jumping on the fun. bandwagon, but if it's what they compromise on, I think it'd be an easy radio hit.
|
It Takes Two would slay careers

|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/29/2012
Posts: 22,883
|
Ugh I'm just gonna come out. Team #ITT or nothing else. **** the other two.
Oh and a tour promo video with IS just for umich.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/3/2014
Posts: 5,919
|
Quote:
Originally posted by goldsoundz
Officially team WOA. I love "Legendary Lovers," and I get why other people do, but after spending time trying and failing to make it more mainstream friendly, I feel the impending third mid-hit in my gut. Simply put, with casual fans/non-fans, "Walking On Air" is either "amazing" or "a great ode to the early 90s," while "Legendary Lovers" is either "amazing" or "no." Singles aren't about pleasing fans, they're about selling albums (or singles, at this point).
Even though "Legendary Lovers" is a gillion times better than this song, I just don't think it's going to click with enough people when they hear it on the radio as is or with minor tweaks. I'll happily eat my words, but I thought this and "Unconditionally" were doomed from the start.
I'd be fine with "It Takes Two," also. It's a bit late to be jumping on the fun. bandwagon, but if it's what they compromise on, I think it'd be an easy radio hit.
|
Not Walking On Trash 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 2,211
|
Anything other than LL or WOA is going to flop, you gerls need to come out of denial.

|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/2/2014
Posts: 8,759
|
Album: PRISM
#43 Norway (+71)
#56 Canada (+9)
#73 Belgium (+31)
#76 Australia (+10)
#89 Turkey (+13)
#97 United States (+17)
#133 Japan (+49)
TIHWD still selling the album
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/1/2012
Posts: 12,442
|
It Takes Two's burnrate is too high.
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/19/2013
Posts: 2,575
|
I'm still sticking to LL.  I'm going to laugh so hard when WOA flops, and when it becomes a hit, then I'll act as a normal stan! 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 12/22/2011
Posts: 55,626
|
98.9M September 29.
This btch. She better not troll me and wait until October 1 the video smash TIHWD vevocertified.
Not even radio backlash or corrupt, sassy djs can stop TIWHD from being a global hit.
When will Birthday?
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 12/22/2011
Posts: 55,626
|
Not the final mix though.
Quote:
Originally posted by Kworb
One year of this song and it's still as flawless as ever 
|
Played it today while dropping my puppy off to doggy daycare.
He was nodding his head. Impact.
Quote:
Originally posted by goldsoundz
Officially team WOA. I love "Legendary Lovers," and I get why other people do, but after spending time trying and failing to make it more mainstream friendly, I feel the impending third mid-hit in my gut. Simply put, with casual fans/non-fans, "Walking On Air" is either "amazing" or "a great ode to the early 90s," while "Legendary Lovers" is either "amazing" or "no." Singles aren't about pleasing fans, they're about selling albums (or singles, at this point).
Even though "Legendary Lovers" is a gillion times better than this song, I just don't think it's going to click with enough people when they hear it on the radio as is or with minor tweaks. I'll happily eat my words, but I thought this and "Unconditionally" were doomed from the start.
I'd be fine with "It Takes Two," also. It's a bit late to be jumping on the fun. bandwagon, but if it's what they compromise on, I think it'd be an easy radio hit.
|
YOUUUUUUUUUUUUUU BTCHHHHHHH 
How dare you? 
Hey my trinity has been released? They can push Int'l vile or walking on rupaul's drag race and I'd be fine.
SO I take it they've made a decision to go with walking on g'air then.
The katykats have been amazing.
Quote:
Originally posted by Gouldkaty
Not Walking On Trash 
|
Yes lowered expectations.
|
|
|
|
ATRL Administrator
Member Since: 6/29/2002
Posts: 77,601
|
It Takes Two is a bonus track.
TIHWD is officially over. We will remember its unrealized potential, the way it successfully performed CPR on a dying era, and in all future stan fights it can be used to counter the payola argument.
TIHWD made PRISM's heart beat again, and now it's time for LL to restore it to consciousness. 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 12/22/2011
Posts: 55,626
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Kworb
It Takes Two is a bonus track.
TIHWD is officially over. We will remember its unrealized potential, the way it successfully performed CPR on a dying era, and in all future stan fights it can be used to counter the payola argument.
TIHWD made PRISM's heart beat again, and now it's time for LL to restore it to consciousness. 
|
It's officially over AFTER it becomes vevo certified 
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/15/2013
Posts: 11,360
|
Quote:
Originally posted by goldsoundz
Officially team WOA. I love "Legendary Lovers," and I get why other people do, but after spending time trying and failing to make it more mainstream friendly, I feel the impending third mid-hit in my gut. Simply put, with casual fans/non-fans, "Walking On Air" is either "amazing" or "a great ode to the early 90s," while "Legendary Lovers" is either "amazing" or "no." Singles aren't about pleasing fans, they're about selling albums (or singles, at this point).
Even though "Legendary Lovers" is a gillion times better than this song, I just don't think it's going to click with enough people when they hear it on the radio as is or with minor tweaks. I'll happily eat my words, but I thought this and "Unconditionally" were doomed from the start.
I'd be fine with "It Takes Two," also. It's a bit late to be jumping on the fun. bandwagon, but if it's what they compromise on, I think it'd be an easy radio hit.
|
It Takes Two an easy radio hit? I'm starting to doubt you're an "insider" and Legendary Lovers is fine as it is, check the polls about LL vs WOA... if there's a song stans and non-stans like it's LL not WOA. Of course I know ATRL is not indicative of what will smash and either way I think both LL and WOA deserve to be singles.
And I agree with singles not being for pleasing fans, that's why I'm against ITT being a single.
|
|
|
|
|
|