Consequence of Sound

http://consequenceofsound.net/2014/0...heek-to-cheek/

C+

C+ is a 58, so it is not going to stay in the 70s. Oops.

Welp, that's that.

That review sounds positive tho

Yawn, **** that. I'm sick of all these amazingly positive reviews by actual jazz critics being ignored while these pop critics who don't listen to jazz get to have their reviews counted.

Not me avoiding this thread all day and a negative review is posted as soon as I post.

Bye.

The review is so positive, though....


Is it just that they refuse to give Gaga good score???? Seriously, what kind of bizarre dissonance. Heaven rest us, she's not asbestos!

Lemme e-mail the author and ask why such a low score for such a positive review since I'm actually curious.

Edit: NVM, I can't find an email. She does have a Twitter, however, if any of you want to kindly inquire about her mismatched review and score: https://twitter.com/kateallthetime

Y'all should be e-mailing about that Chicago Tribune review getting added. [email protected]

I e-mailed them about Billboard's BTW review and it got added. (score unchanged though )

What the hell The review sounds like an 80-90

How do you know they don't listen to Jazz? That's quite the assumption.

The CoS review sounds like at least a B.

Remixed, his impact though.

I'd really like that reviewer to explain their mismatched score. I hope one of y'all tweet her and she replied.

Bc it's quite obvious to me, tbh. If you read the reviews from the jazz experts and then the reviews from sites like Billboard and now CoS, the differences are blatant and in your face. Not to mention most, if not all of the jazz experts have done nothing but praise her to the high heavens.