Back to ATRL
This is
Classic ATRL
, an interactive archive of our original website.
Music News
Charts
Videos
Celebria
Base
The Lounge
Best Of
YTT
Games
TRL Archive
User Name
Remember Me
Password
Members who joined ATRL prior to 2017, sign in here.
Any changes made to your password do not sync.
Classic ATRL
>
The Lounge
>
Discussion: Non Gaga fans: Is Gaga pop royalty?
Sign In
Discussion: Non Gaga fans: Is Gaga pop royalty?
Page 2 of 2
< Prev
1
2
Last Post
Actions
Ramos
Member Since: 8/18/2013
Posts: 45,485
Post #21
Yes, she's the new Queen of Pop & Jazz after all.
accelgors
Member Since: 9/1/2013
Posts: 18,649
Post #22
she's queen of the gays does that count
no not really, not yet
XtinaFansBePoor
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 776
Thread Starter
|
Post #23
Quote:
Originally posted by
Ramos
Yes, she's the new Queen of Pop
& Jazz
after all.
lol shes queen
Travis Bickle
Member Since: 4/27/2012
Posts: 9,977
Post #24
LMAO no.
bye
Member Since: 8/19/2013
Posts: 788
Post #25
She needs more mainstream success and albums that are actually good
DitaBoy12
Member Since: 1/26/2012
Posts: 9,236
Post #26
Not at all.
Lights and Waves
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 9,799
Post #27
Yes
XtinaFansBePoor
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 776
Thread Starter
|
Post #28
Quote:
Originally posted by
Manicure
She needs more mainstream success and albums that are actually good
wesleywalrus
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 26,845
Post #29
No she's not, coming from a Gaga stan. She needs 10+ years to prove whether she is or not.
XtinaFansBePoor
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 776
Thread Starter
|
Post #30
Quote:
Originally posted by
wesleywalrus
No she's not, coming from a Gaga stan. She needs 10+ years to prove whether she is or not.
10+ successful years that is
WarriorQueen
Member Since: 11/6/2011
Posts: 4,475
Post #31
No
Alchemist
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 9,438
Post #32
The term pop royalty is a joke
No one after Britney is considered pop royalty because it only applies to MJ, Madonna and Britney so..
SadJudasPanda69
Member Since: 3/15/2013
Posts: 2,522
Post #33
Quote:
Originally posted by
Dark_Lorde
No. She has certainly made a mark on pop culture but she's not royalty.
No one would dare deny her once relevance and influence but I think to be "pop royalty" you need to have a proven track record of longevity.
No one is to say she won't get there, but certainly not yet.
This. And this is coming from a stan. She still has time to become part of the royalty though. Only time will tell.
wesleywalrus
Member Since: 1/1/2014
Posts: 26,845
Post #34
Quote:
Originally posted by
XtinaFansBePoor
10+ successful years that is
she doesn't need to be successful to be "pop royalty".
she just needs to make a bigger impact. you can't be royalty if you haven't been in the pop industry for more than 15+ years
Page 2 of 2
< Prev
1
2
Actions for this Thread
Print this Thread
"Absolute TRL" 1999-2006; "Popfusion" 2006-2007; "ATRL" 2007-present
