If the artcile that says Katy herself called the dancers is able to be used than the article that says taylor was unapproachable and boring is able to be used.

That's irrelevant anyways - The dancer/dancers wanted to leave so, they left. If they breached a contract they would have paid a penalty for breaching the contract. - That's it. That's business.

They may have been bored. Katy may have offered them a better deal... whatever it was aslong as they meet their contractual obligations or pay a penalty for breaking them they have every right to do it.

For all you know, they told taylors team they were unhappy and were LET out of the contract.

I think it's a similar situation as Ed Sheeran's Don't. Do you think he plays the victim card in the song? I don't think so

Did Ed Sheeran get much crap for 'Don't'? Does not feel like he did.

Let the war begin

Let me tell you something about Taylor Swift. We we were both nominated at the 2011 Grammy Awards. I know, right? I had no chance. I don't even... Whatever. So then the following year, I started going out with her ex boyfriend John Mayer who was totally gorgeous but then he moved on to another cvm dump & Taylor was like, weirdly jealous of me. Like, if I would get a #1 without a discount, she'd be like, "Why didn't you hit me up for a remix" And I'd be like, "Why are you so obsessed with me?" So then, for the backstage party in my dressing room at the MTV Video Music awards which was an all-girls drinking party I was like, " Taylor I can't invite you, because I think you're a lesbian." I mean I couldn't have A LESBIAN at my party, JESSIE J was gonna be there in her *sexy two piece* I mean, right? She was a LESBIAN. So then her manager called my manager and started yelling at him, it was so retarded. And then she stopped doing country because my dark horse killed her white horse, and she came back in the summer with a pop record, all including her vocals and ass remained flat, she was totally scissoring Lorde, and now I guess she's writing crap.*

... And these songs are meant to shame her exes.

What

What even

That's because he is STILL a non-factor in pop culture. I don't even follow him, who does I wonder...

Of course I have
Andof course you can leave
But does katy really need to make those dancers break taylor's contract
knowing that she is in the middle of the tour and that would be very hard to change the whole coreography in a couple of days? I wouldn't like to someone to do that in my job
She just could contrack other dacers. And yes, you can leave your contract if you thing your job is boring, but that's so unprofessional,

not us thinking about the same song at the same time

Just because she's a female, then if she wants to scalp somebody in a song, she would automatically be playing the victim card

Oop at this already being messier than Katy vs Gaga from last year.

They are both bitchy in the end for starting/continuing.

Whether or not the dancers were bored, they were still obligated to fill their duties!! The fact that they did not, leaves them up for questionable re-hirement!! Put it this way, the only people they can work for is Katy, from this day and out, smart?! Not necessarily. But if Katy tried to hire them back while they were still on the RED tour, then, yes, that's ****ed up in KP part

Holly the scream I just let out. Is this an original piece? Nobel worthy tbh.

The only difference is, Gaga and Taylor make quality Grammy-worthy music

No it's not unprofessional.

That's like saying "every pop girl has to tell the other pop girls when they are about to release music so they don't release music at the same time"

Or another example is, it was unprofessional for gaga to move applause' release date close to roars. - It wasn't. It's business.

You all don't get there's an entire business behind your faves