no thanks im fine with gender

Sounds boring tbh

this would be utopia.

Gender roles and sex go hand and hand, you can't have one without the other. The fact that women bear children determines a lot of it, and I don't see how that can change.

Not really. Women staying home and men being the hunter and provider was a natural thing, due to women being pregnant. Humans didn't decide that.

nah I love boys too much....:P emo boys.

A world in which a fluid concept of gender is accepted and in which no strong social expectations are tied to gender is probably more viable than a world entirely without gender. The options to conform to an extent to what is traditionally conceived to be binary gender are options actually desired by some, but the fact that we treat the two binary genders as unequal and prescribe roles to them is a massive problem.

I suppose what I mean to say is that if someone wants to act in a way that today is perceived as feminine or masculine, regardless of whether that perception shifts and that way of acting is seen in a different light, they should be able to do that without the roles that come with behavior.

I mean, if you really think of it, gender is actually in no way a binary spectrum - it's more of a complex field of different personal characteristics and personal feelings that actually have nothing to do with behavior. I mean, I consider myself a "guy" or one of the various synonyms to that word, and that's how I identify, but how does that relate at all to how I talk, walk, organize personal belongings, or consume entertainment?

I suppose that while I agree that the destruction of the notion of gender entirely would be beneficial in many ways, I do think that gender serves to give some sort of context to certain things. It's a hard thing to imagine because we've all grown up in a world so widely defined by gender. In some ways it's clear that we need to remove ourselves as a society from the limitations of gender, but it brings up a lot more questions and it's not an easy topic to address.

I think that we're well past the point, as an intelligent society, of basing all our social interaction on biological reproduction. Gender roles have very little to do with sex in modern times. The issue isn't whether gender roles served a useful purpose at some point in human history, but rather it is whether gender as a construct should continue to be utilized in human interaction. A woman can still contribute to society in certain ways while pregnant and earn a living, and a man no longer needs to be the "breadwinner" when women today are just as capable. While women bearing children cannot biologically change, the notion that pregnancy and motherhood incapacitate a woman with regard to "labor" and societal contribution can change.