With TV, isn't ratings moreso about the percentage of viewers that hold a bigger weight, rather than the #?
I usually see professionals care about the stuff like "10% of the 18-24 group tuned in, against 8% last year" rather than "8.4 million tuned in, compared to 6.4 million last year".
If so many people were here for Britney rather than Bey in 2011 why wasn't Britney the most tweeted person ever (w/o even having a twitter) that night. Why did Femme Fatale sell less than 4 if everyone was here for her? Why did Britney gross almost 4 times less than Beyonce when she toured during her era while Beyonce waited 2 years before touring for 4. Hell Beyonce still sold about 3times more if you drop the last leg where new music was performed No one has been here for Britney since 2008.
I wonder how much money MTV and The Beygency are paying Nielsen Soundscan for decent, fake rating numbers.
They must still be in negotiations. It's the only explanation for "the delay" in releasing the ratings publicly.
Her cheery, stoical take on celebrity and tabloid intrusion has served her well. “I am not gonna let them make me miserable when I could be enjoying my life,” she says. “That’s why you see these artists become a tabloid regular and then become artistically and musically irrelevant, because they let [gossipy websites] stifle them. It’s not going to happen here.”
I wonder how much money MTV and The Beygency are paying Nielsen Soundscan for decent, fake rating numbers.
They must still be in negotiations. It's the only explanation for "the delay" in releasing the ratings publicly.
...Vin
Nielsen was in a scandal for fake ratings this year too, with someone.
I wonder how much money MTV and The Beygency are paying Nielsen Soundscan for decent, fake rating numbers.
They must still be in negotiations. It's the only explanation for "the delay" in releasing the ratings publicly.
...Vin
Right like this is ridiculous although no unexpected considering Beyonces entire life is fabricated
No one has been here for Britney since 2008.
