Where is the lie in "condoms are only 75% effective"? It's right when you took "condoms are" and followed it by saying "only 75% effective." Literally the whole thing is a lie.
Where is the lie in "condoms are only 75% effective"? It's right when you took "condoms are" and followed it by saying "only 75% effective." Literally the whole thing is a lie.
If someone is stupid enough to use a non-water based lubricant, then I feel sorry for them for their lack of sexual education. But that doesn't change the fact that you said condoms "are only 75% effective though" which isn't true. That's a false statistic that you just made up on the spot.
If someone is stupid enough to use a non-water based lubricant, then I feel sorry for them for their lack of sexual education. But that doesn't change the fact that you said condoms "are only 75% effective though" which isn't true. That's a false statistic that you just made up on the spot.
Ok. A snarky remark instead of something useful or sensible. Got it. It was nice talking to you lol.
Well maybe those who are promiscuous regardless of sexual orinention should be offered to take the drug. That would probably prevent a lot of new infections already. This would be sensible thing to suggest instead of telling that all of us gays should take it.
