Quote:
Originally posted by Ain't No Other
First of all: I don't know if you're aware of this, but many members here have NOT read the books. So the fact that some go you have been talking about
Lady Stoneheart's appearance
for days/weeks without having any consideration for the rest of the fans who knew nothing about it, without using any spoiler tags, is disrespectful. Specially considering that nothing related to that even happened in last night's episode.
So I will say this: from now on, you will use spoiler tags if you want to talk about storylines that have yet to happen in the series. You will not give any hints about what will happen in future seasons. Or I will personally make sure that you will get both WPs and a thread ban.
|
Sorry but yeh what the actual ****?
How has discussion of this become seen as somehow not spoiler material?
Everyone kept using that three letter acronym - some not even that, just writing the name - without spoiler tags, as if it was common knowledge? Having read through this thread I just learnt to accept that I know have knowledge of some random new character which is completely and utterly unrelated to anything so far shown in the show.
And yet most you ALL claim "only 1 or 2 book readers are doing the spoiling". Errrrrr, no. ANYONE who posted that name gave spoiler material and I saw it about 20-30 times. I mean I NEVER read behind the spoiler tags in this thread yet now the finale is a bit of a question mark for me because I can't help but thinking about this extra wildcard information and how it didn't show up.