No. None of her songs have any impact except IKAG

It's true, I watched it just a few days ago when one of your colleagues posted the video.

The only thing I heard was some faint ella ella.

Who said that

Good for her
Rih already did it with less than a hundred dates

I use you, your soo messy

Look. If you post the truth I have no problem. You can make your point.

But you're just being delusional... Do you think Katy hasn't grown at all since 2011?

That's the figure from CDT in Birmingham.
And Birmingham is the city she made 1M+ with an 87% house in 2014.


....

You haven't answered my question.

They're about the same

Of course not.

n

Whatever you say honey

The one I saw had the audience singing clearly both the chorus and the hook but of course you'd rather constipate than admit to the truth when it comes to rih so have a good day sir.

IKAG was huge . Her only song that really felt big besides HnC

Yes 24
No 40

No, I don't believe that Katy has surpassed Rihanna in any aspect yet.

Her "California Dreams" tour had 124 dates but only grossed $59.5 million

Rih had less tour dates (97) and got up to triple digits

but WHO actually said that. What if I think otherwise

The funny part is that the people saying no were the same people saying yes back when Katy slayed GaGa back in August - November.


Rihanna is Rihanna and Katy is Katy. They're both disgustingly success, I don't think there should be a want to compare them.

No

Yes for the hugeness of Katy's career over a shorter period of time. Rihanna is super huge where she is now though, and while it took her more time, more albums and singles, she's where she is, and no one should underestimate her. I think like Katy, Rihanna was probably expected to be a one hit wonder, but look at where she is now. Both are massively successful and here to stay.