Quote:
Originally posted by Katie
It was abrasive. That dig at their grammar was what put it over the top. It won't be reversed 
|
Katie first and foremost, I am not arguing with you but clarifying something.
With your permission, let me explain.
The original author said "It means your reports are pointless because less than half get warned ".
And I simply told him to correct
"that grammar" and it's not even like I used
"your grammar". I did not even mock at him.
My point was that it's NOT pointless as far as half of the reports were warned.
Last but not the least, the Original Author
later even agreed on this
post which was my point. .
Katie, please see to it. I will bow down to your decision this time. Please think about this with a cool mind taking into consideration what I just wrote.