Since everyone is proposing/predicting new systems, I think I should share my good ideas that people seemed like in a dead thread I made this post in:
Quote:
Originally posted by Javan
Lol. You would think so. But it could work . For an ATRL Supreme Court System.
1. We would need a more elaborate rulebook/constitution. For example a more explicit andd consistent definition of flamebait.
2.Keep the Executive and Legislative combined as usual
3. But the judiciary needs more devolution. Like an appeals court is independent from criminal courts, their should be an mod body that deal with appeals only and is independent from the mods that punish with WPs. These mods could be obliged to neutrality and they wont inbetween the lines and take a post at face value(with in reason) and with a less ambiguous book of law there will be no room for double standards, bias or debate. Most importantly, Mods will not be able reverse the points they dish out which shouldn't be a problem but can be seen as problematic here with bias and what not.
We can make it work guys. #Javan4Admin
Well are you here for it? It might be 2015's April surprise
i am the mods have way too much power i dont think we should have our threads closed if we have a legitimate complaint that is being ignored by the powers above
Hmmm. I think y'all are missing the point. It's not gonna be a long battle and trial like a real court. It's just having the ability to have a different moderator reverse your WP. A mod who dishes the WP is inherently biased and leans towards not reversing it because it's like admitting you are wrong/you made a mistake etc. Separating the roles would minimize that bias? You get? The way we request reversals doesn't have to change
Hmmm. I think y'all are missing the point. It's not gonna be a long battle and trial like a real court. It's just having the ability to have a different moderator reverse your WP. A mod who dishes the WP is inherently biased and leans towards not reversing it because it's like admitting you are wrong/you made a mistake etc. Separating the roles would minimize that bias? You get? The way we request reversals doesn't have to change
I agree, the fact that only the original mod can reverse a WP makes absolutely no sense. There should be a more balanced process that also keeps the warned user informed on the status of the appeal.
. For an ATRL Supreme Court System.
) sit in the Supreme Court.
