So with the changes being made to ATRL moderation.

Again, (no representation of Madonna but whatever) doesn't it stand to reason that warning points should be reviewed and reversed if necessary.

The advise given in regards to mods being removed was "bias" then the warning points those ex mods had given should all be reviewed and if ATRL doesn't have the capacity to review each one, they should all be reversed.

YES. I have two extremely unjust warning points dished out purely for calling out a mod.

Disgusting abuse of power.

No bc Frozen

Yes, but the most biased mods were left on the team unfortunately

Yes.

If they're going to admit bias was a problem then they should be prepared to right the wrongs, yes?

Agreed. I have 9 warning points, and I obviously don't wanna be banned for one month. Most of them are from fighting with miley cyrus fans.

Yes!

I kinda agree tbh... My Gaga "drags" deserve to be reversed because they weren't even drags OR flamebait

Set a redo button so everyone's clean!

Most of my warning points I agree with however I received one for making a thread titled MADONNA - BEYONCE.

The thread engaged both fans and the story provided said wonderful things about both of them and how they were similar in their business ethics.

I was warned under "disruptive" by one of the ex mods because my title was all in capitals. - What kind of nonsense is that, honestly.

I've been warned for the most ridiculous things as well.

Yes especially the one's where you give your own faves a "nickname" that means something good like

Don't bother with ha.

You know. This is ****ing true! I was warned for flamebait for posting a Bey gif. That's it. #Time4Justice #votestereolove

This is the most irritating. Easily their worst rule.

This