Gaga, hands down.. though I've loved Britney since 1998.

Gaga. hands down because she sings live.

Obviously Gaga. Britney would never be able to put a show on like her

how is britney winning lmao without even singing, no acoustic, just dance moves :S

lies

imo Britney had better stage presence than Gaga. Britney's stage presence in her prime was unrivaled at that time.

Otherwise they're too different to compare and it's all a matter of opinion. I've lived through both of their peaks and I prefer Gaga overall. To me, Gaga brings a lot more to the table as a performer than Britney at her peak. While Britney was a much better dancer, Gaga has live vocals, instruments, audience interaction, and theatrics to her advantage. And Gaga is a decent dancer too.

Over all, Gaga. But not current Gaga.

Gaga's VMA performance 2009 says otherwise

Britney in her prime (probably now too) by a mile.

Gaga has always been a messy performer to me with a few exceptions (SNL Paparazzi, UK Xfactor Bad Romance).

MATM if you even bothered to watch.

and literally the only thing yall are using against britney is "live singing" but britney has better stage presence, more charisma, better dancer, and is a lot more captivating. I guess it's all up to what you value, but live singing doesn't really matter to me if you can perform like britney in her prime. I think if given the option, more people would rather see prime britney perform than gaga today..

jfc people we know Britney lip syncs quit bringing it up the fact she does, Didnt excuse the fact that she was such an amazing performer back then that she had the likes of Michael Jackson and Madonna performng with her

Gaga

Britney!

Back in her prime, she didnt have to use too many props to put on a great show. She was perfect

I don't see any lies. There's always a meaning and an intention behind her theatrical performances.

Britney relied more on gimmicks, I mean was there any reason why she brought a snake on stage? or kissing Madonna? No, they were just there to shock.