Do you agree with the statement above?
Do you think that the more Grammys an artist has the better his music is? And do you believe an artist with more Grammys than another artist is superiore?
No. Grammys are for connections, not for quality. They're great promotion, though, and an ingenious way to create dependency and a monopoly on "quality"-driven award shows in the music industry.
No. I'm very grateful for Rih's 7 Grammys but Rated R it was critically acclaimed and included on many top album in that year and it didn't had 1 nomination while Unapologetic, the album with her worst reviews received a Grammy.
Yes.
Beyonce, Adele, Taylor.
That being said Lack of Grammy's doesn't mean your music sucks though.
Nicki, Katy, Leona Ariana Ed Sheeran, Kendrick Lamar *sometimes* and Jermaine Cole have amazing music.
No. Grammys are for connections, not for quality. They're great promotion, though, and an ingenious way to create dependency and a monopoly on "quality"-driven award shows in the music industry.
Some of yall swear up and down yall know what yall talkin about like
--
Anyway Grammys> Whatever you perceive as "better" music.
