Quote:
Originally posted by KangBey
Just about everyone who has commented on why they can't stan for her mentioned she can't sing and has no talent. I know it, you know it and the general public knows she can't sing and doesn't have any talent and isn't considered a legend by the general public in the least.
At 32yrs old her career is done, MJ, Whitney, Mariah and now Beyoncé were/are slaying at 32. They were/are able to still go multi platinum, get a top 3 hit, gross well over 150 million on tour etc at the age of 32. What Britney is doing now, she should be doing in her 40s. Even Pink is more of a legend, slaying hard at 36 with top 3 hits, multi platinum albums and huge touring gross.
You know what, its better if we let the army live in their delusions, because the hard core reality of Britney's career status is a hard pill to swallow.
|
Nobody stans for Britney for her flawless vocals. She has lip synced for pretty much all of her career and guess what? She still peaked higher and was more successful than most of the other pop girls. And we all know Britney has talent. She can play instruments, she could dance. Granted, she can't dance now as well as she could 10 years ago but in her prime there was nobody even on her level. Everybody is aware that Britney doesn't want to be famous and she doesn't care about her career as much as she used to, but she could slay if she wanted to. It was only 3 years ago where she had 3 top 10 hits in the US, one of which debuted at #1.
Her flopping now doesn't mean the rest of her legacy is tarnished, and she's frequently referred to as the princess of pop and a legend because they are what she is.
I don't know why you're comparing her to Pink because they are completely different artists and Pink actually promotes her work, whereas Britney doesn't. Have you not noticed that all of Britney's work she's promoted has done well, yet songs she's just ignored have flopped? I think that proved if Britney was to put more effort in she could easily slay.
But judging by your logic you simply believe legend status is built on sales and huge tours. It's not. If that was the case, in 20 years, artists like Katy Perry with no actual impact are deemed legends simply because they know how to create generic chart topping singles that smash and they can go on successful tours. Nope. Not a legend.
Britney's residency is selling out. She could still dominate the charts if she wanted to, and that's what it's all about - she doesn't want to. Because when she wants to, she can - her records and amazing sales are proof of this.