Oh did i talk about facts?
Well most of the thing Gaga does is ART for you guys so let me not!
Vomiting is not ART! Jeez then again everything is considered Art nowadays, so why am i surprised at the Critics loving it!
I mean i could literally **** on a table and have an exposition in a Contemporary Arts Museum

No, its a perfect example of pop-desperation

This.

While I certainly think it can easily be considered art, it does seem really desperate for attention.

i agree just a little

I'm only here for the pressed rebuttals and excuses for why it's not "art."

ART. She's a performance artist. It obviously makes you pressed

Not.Its disgusting

I feel so bad for her. It must hurt deeply to fall from that high so fast!

Most of the ones still on the Stockholm Syndrome ship are that way. They'll defend whatever she does, no matter how repulsive. If she committed murder, they'd call it art.

Yes, if she committed murder we'd call it art. That's the leap you take from vomit. Goodness me, the other girls being basic for so long has really done a number here.

So it's not art because it's Lady Gaga?
Because to think so would be "narrow minded?"
Because it's vomit?
Is Millie Brown even a variable anymore?
Symbolism?
Metaphors?

HELP!

She did the exact same thing 4 years ago for the monster ball and no one said a thing.
the transparent bitterness and hypocrisy

Except that isn't all you do. You act as if to call this art makes you mentally unstable, which is bullsh*t.

It was both. It's definitely art, but it's also disgusting, unnecessary and completely for attention.

take a chill pill .it's atrl

There's been plenty many of us haven't liked - her looks for the past week, her absence, some songs on ARTPOP, her ARTPOP messages on Twitter (and her tweets in general), her LM.com stuff, etc. Because we got life from this performance doesn't make us blind followers. Thinking it does makes a person a blind hater, though.