Quote:
Originally posted by GreasyBruce
It's weird. I read that "latino" and "hispanic" are terms coined by American marketing companies that were trying to find a term to describe people in Latin America and their descendants in the United States (including people from the southern part of the US, which used to be Mexico until the US invaded it under their imperialistic expansionist model and took it over illegally).
I don't like those terms and don't use them, they erase the racial, ethnic and cultural differences present within Latin America (it's very frustrating when people assume "latino" is a race). I just say "Latin Americans" or refer to people by their specific race (Amerindian, mixed Amerindian/white European, white European, black, etc) or by their nationality.
|
No, no, I'm sure those companies held on to the term for those reasons, but the term itself was created by the French.
Back in the 19th century when the French invaded Mexico (shortly after independence) and founded a Mexican "Empire." Napoleon III of France wanted to form alliances with Mexico and other former Spanish/Portuguese colonies, so he (and his followers) kept writing about how France and these American countries had common Latin origins, like their languages, Roman Catholicism, etc.
So yeah, basically the term was an imperialistic tool used by the French, but it stuck across Latin America, and later on it also stuck in the U.S. as an easy way to classify everything south of the border.
So in