In 1995, he was acquitted of the 1994 murder of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman.

So what do you think? Guilty or still not Guilty?



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O._J._Simpson



[Nicole Brown Simpson


Ronald Goldman

I say guilty of course.

of course.

Any doubt about him being guilty was erased when he brought out that book
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/If_I_Did_It

yes lmao

Yes. I have no doubt about it.

It's pretty obvious he did it.

Lmao it's obvious.

Why do you think the Jury didn't find him guilty at that time? I don't get it.

The prosecution got evidence illegally which ruined their case. They couldn't use it in court and they ruined their reputation with a jury sympathetic to OJ.

I think he did it indirectly if you catch my drift.

Absolutely. It's sad that the way our legal system works tends to be kinder to famous people.

Well for 1 the whole jury was all Africa American and this was a few short yrs after the whole Rodney King debacle and in the SAME city.

Clearly this was a case about RACE. With that said NO black jury is gonna convict one of they're own kind IDC what they did.

Look at the Trayvon Murder case a jury of ALL white woman and all MOTHER'S too ... They wasn't going to convict George (their own kind)

Moral of the story racism is still alive and WELL

ALSO the chances of a celebrity getting convicted in L.A is almost unheard of.

I remember some blacks who were glad he got off, but my mom was like he should have got convicted. Messy case and an even messier jury.

I remember he wrote that book "If I Did It." Didn't they catch tax issues and sent him to jail?

I was glad he got off tho I was like 7 or 8 at the time. EVERYBODY around the world waited and watched this verdict all the black community was GLAD and the whole White community was PISSED baby.

NOW that I'm older I have NO doubt he commented those vicious murders and what makes it even worse is that his CHILDREN was present at the home during the murders SMFH.

1. It was not an all black jury.

2. Rodney Kings did play a part.

3. Again, It was not an all black jury. If it were all racial intentions, or one of the non-black people could actually convict him, it would have lead to a hung jury.

4. Even if the facts were just blanket straight that he did commit the murder, the judge would have given a directed verdict and disregarded the jury's answer. The Jury is just the fact finder with the judge being the one who decides. (AKA, when the jury says they found someone guilty, the person isn't guilty until the judge rules in favor of the verdict.)

5. The Trayvon muder case ended that way because the prosecutor went for a charge she knew she couldn't get. Same way with Casey Anthony, etc. I don't understand why the prosecutors do this in Florida, but if you look at the state (not just the high profile cases) this is a common practice to go for the highest charge possible.

In my personal opinion, is it possible that he did it. Sure is. Is it also possible he hired someone else to do it. Probably as well. I do think he is connected to it, but I wasn't there and I don't feel like putting too much thought into it. He lost the civil case though.

of course we're now talking about race

Pretty good sum up.

I saw it live when O.J. hands tried to fit in the gloves, great "cinema"

This was when they lost their case.

I thought at the time of the crime he was in great shape one year later the hands were a little more thick, the gloves were trenched in blood maybe they were a little shrunk.