Roger Friedman? You mean the guy from Forbes that Madonna fans abhor because he was constantly exposing Madonna? Now all of the sudden he's reliable? :O
In addition, you have nerve when Madonna's charitable acts have been exposed several times. I mean, she ruined an entire village in Malawi because of her lies and "charity" and then had the gall to fly there for a quick PR photo op to make people think she was doing good.
When it comes to this, I don't see the problem. $1.5m for publicity, lawyers, and a website doesn't seem like that big of a deal, especially since it came from Gaga's own pocket. As with any charity run by a famous person, loads of money is going to go into these things, that's just how it works. Starting a charity isn't cheap.
Quote:
Originally posted by Daydream
This.
I mean, someone link me to an article about something good this foundarion has done, someone saying it's helped them...
Nah? Thought so.
If absolutely no results have been shown, that ain't on. Makes you question where people's money is really going.
|
This is like saying because kids in Africa don't talk to the media about Bill and Melinda Gates' foundation, their foundation is sketchy.
