Hi! I was wondering why my thread Awkward Comparisons got closed, and why it even got reported in the first place? I am not upset, but just curious! Thanks!
Hi! I was wondering why my thread Awkward Comparisons got closed, and why it even got reported in the first place? I am not upset, but just curious! Thanks!
There were some racially tinged elements - in the first post even! - that skated the line.
This is the requirement for something to be explicit
Quote:
Explicit
Posted an explicit image without linking it inside [warning] and [url] tags or their avatar and/or signature contains excessively vulgar content.
My thread contained none of the above and I got a WP for it. And Condoms are not explicit
This is the requirement for something to be explicit
My thread contained none of the above and I got a WP for it. And Condoms are not explicit
The definition is being reworked in the future but that thread was only meant to promote explicit discussion. It is not necessary and goes against what we're trying to be as a forum.
The definition is being reworked in the future but that thread was only meant to promote explicit discussion. It is not necessary and goes against what we're trying to be as a forum.
Explicit as in numbers, most members only posted a number. It wasn't harmful at all.
"Trans" isn't offensive. It's actually the best word you can use, to be honest. Though, "trans*" is slightly better because it refers to everything with the prefix "trans" in relation to gender other than just "transgender" which people usually associate it with.
The definition is being reworked in the future but that thread was only meant to promote explicit discussion. It is not necessary and goes against what we're trying to be as a forum.
Since the definition will be reworked in the future can my WP be reversed please. Lack of information shouldn't result in me getting a WP for something I believed was harmful considering the guidelines