Quote:
Originally posted by Mezter
Child...Atlanta has a metro area of almost 6 million people. Nashville only has 1.5 million. Atlanta is the 9th largest metro in the US. Nashville comes in at #36. On top of that, Atlanta is much larger in area.They aren't comparable AT ALL.
|
Dude:
1. Atlanta needs the larger area to accompany more people.
2. The list for largest metro takes in account population. It doesn't take into account the size of the city. Actually that works against Atlanta because you have more people in a confined space. You should really think this through.
3. The argument was on infrastructure. Nashville, while having a smaller infrastructure than Atlanta, does have a big enough infrastructure to hold the games minus the 4.5 million people that Atlanta has to deal with. Common sense dictates that having to deal with less people during a game would be better.
4. To your last point.
Atlanta Metro Area:
8,376 sq mi
21,694 km2
Nashville Metro Area:
7,484 sq. mi.
16,520 km2
The actual Area is only 1,000 sq miles bigger with less than 4.5 million people. Thus Nashville has more room. Therefore, they are comparable.
Lastly, referring to someone as a child only hurts your argument instead of helps.