That, and I think Christina is asked for more collaborations.

Let's just break it down. Comparing these two people is a tired topic. They're not even honestly comparable artists anymore.

Britney has had and likely will potentially have more commercial and worldwide appeal. Her music is fun and she's always had the it factor. She has the albums/sales under her belt.

Christina took much longer between eras, putting out music that was often polarizing--not everyone loved jazz Christina or electronic Christina. Yet her voice is amazing; she has the voice. She's collaborated not just with ATRL pop-ish acts like Pitbull and Maroon 5, but also with The Rolling Stones, Elton John, Tony Bennett, Herbie Hancock, etc.

Nobody Wants To Be Lonely too? I do know Tilt Ya Head Back was originally with Britney but her team rejected it.

anyways, we should stop with this arguing lol. it's not 2001 anymore...

I don't know why people are comparing Lotus and "Your Body" to Britney Jean and "Work Bitch" when it should be compared to Britney's seventh album Femme Fatale and "Hold It Against Me".

Christina.

None

Britney has always been and will always be.

Because Britney Jean also outperformed Lotus



Britney wasn't the only artist radiobanned. And I don't think Stripped wouldn't have still been a success, but Britney probably would've sold at least another million or two copies and distanced herself further if not for some illegal behind-the-scenes tampering.

How many influential stations, though? I won't rule out Christina being banned just because I haven't personally followed her like you, but she still seems to get support from a lot of radio stations, especially judging by MLJ, FTM and SS. Again, I won't discredit your statement since you follow Christina more than I ever have, but just know for comparison's sake that Britney went from Oops, which had a Pop #1, top 10, top 20 to the Britney era, which started out huge ("I'm A Slave 4 U" was set to be a giant crossover hit and was gaining rapidly) until Britney signed with the wrong tour promoter. IAS4U stalled at #15 on pop and #85 on Rhythmic the week after announcing her tour and then free-fell. Overprotected made it to #37 (on pop). INAGNYAW made it to #21. Boys made it to #32.

I agree that Christina should've performed (or just aired her The Voice performance of) "Your Body," but Circus did just fine without a first single performance till the day the second single and album dropped. Christina performing on The Voice should have been enough because it's kind of taken over from American Idol as the biggest promo spot in the U.S. (sans the SuperBowl and commercials).

Then I guess together SS and FTM may pass S&S.

You realize that the best-selling digital single of all-time, "I Gotta Feeling," was released the same year as "Keeps Gettin' Better," right? On top of that, "Poker Face," "Just Dance," "Circus," "Womanizer," "Hot N' Cold," "I Kissed a Girl" and "Single Ladies" were all released the same year. Digital downloads were stronger in 2008 and the following years than in 2013/2014.

"Keeps Gettin' Better" had more pop radio support than "Work B**ch." KGB was only 1 spot away from entering the top 10 on pop. WB stalled at #14 because it was too explicit and the edit was undeniable ****.

The streaming kept Britney from debuting at #6. The streaming rule hindered Britney. If Christina had been under the same rule, she wouldn't have gotten a top 10 debut either. Did Christina ever get back in to the top besides her debut week with KGB?

As for "KGB" selling KGB:ADOH, it was her first compilation album after literally a decade of hits. The album should have done considerably better than 1 million WW, especially with a VMA and AMAs performance.

Britney, still.

The one whose name is capable of headlining a residency.

This thread again?

It just seems more fair to compare seventh album to seventh album.
Even if one's eighth album still did better than the other's seventh.