SHICD working this out.#modstatus

No thanks. If I knew that I can get a wp for simply bumpin an old thread then I would't do it. I simply knew (I read that in this thread) that I can get a wp for shade in an old thread. There was no shade in either post. And in that Garrix thread I cannot even imagine why somebody would imagine that that was shade. And that Robbie post wasnt shade either but I won't argue about that since I can imagine why people could think it's shade

K I edided my sig. However there is nothing shady about my avi.

Katie explained that they're not going to sit there and translate it, so if it's in binary it's warned.

Maybe you should read over the rules more carefully, because I'm pretty sure bumping an old thread, regardless if it is a shady post, is a warnable offense.

That's why I said for future reference.

Oh, I thought that only applied to regular posts.

Either way, it's annoying and needs to go.

A Mod confirmed thatvthis isn't the case. Only if it's shady.

Ah, I see. Thank you for the clarification

Btw I am on my phone and the keys are so small. Typos are expected

Are stan nicknames allowed in blogs? Ones that praise the artist?

That's why warnings exist, to help you learn what kind of behavior is appropriate. They basically are reminders because you don't get banned immediately, and they expire after a month. Now you know not to bump old threads unless you have something very relevant to add.

So much happens in blogs that it would probably slip through the cracks. You probably can, but don't be surprised if you get a WP.

5 wps. Halfway banned

Gorl don't get worried until you're perched at 8

I don't even remember the last time I was down to 5 wps or less