Member Since: 8/1/2012
Posts: 3,817
|
I can see there point, but I don't care.
It was sexy (Granted she should've been singing live the entire performance, which did make her loose a lot of credibility), I don't really feel artists should tame down their act to suit the general public, If the Grammys thought it was appropriate, then that is that. Not that this was an overly artistic performance, but as I said an artist shouldn't have to cut off their creativity etc, to please the viewership, and it's not like her new album is family friendly anyway, as soon as you seen her in the leotard, you the parent have the moral obligation to turn it off, if you don't want your child to watch it, probably because the parents didn't wanna miss the show, so they couldn't really negotiate with the children, cause they'd miss out of seeing The Grammys, but then you really have no right to be complaining, if you had've stopped your children from watching, you would've had nothing to complain about, simple. This is the artists platform, not yours, you just decide whether you watch or not.. You could've simply recorded it or something, and viewed it later in the evening when your children are in bed. Enough said.
|
|
|