Quote:
Originally posted by Miracle Whip
#Beautiful failed to reach top ten yet it sold more than double GMAYL and is a platinum single
#Beautiful had less promo and still outsold GMAYL...
Madonna's last album wouldn't of even reached the top three had it not been for it being included with concert tickets...
She did ONE weight loss commercial not that has anything to do with Mariah's musical career?
Just like Madonna's many endorsements have nothing to do with her musical career?

|
I believe someone already corrected you on the GMAYL comments so I won't repeat it. I'm sure you have the capability to understand
I do have to correct you some more though! The Promo deal counted for about 100k albums. That means MDNA sold 259k without that promo - That's what ARTPOP sold and that still went to #1 so please, don't say that you couldn't possibly know "the only reason it went to #1"
The corrections don't stop there though, you see that promo deal isn't exclusive to Madonna. It's available to every artist around the globe. ARTPOP is being sold through to ARTrave as we speak and did you know that in order for those sales to be counted as sales the ticket purchase needs to be more than 100 dollars and it needs to be in a separate transaction - Ticket holders were emailed a download code then at a later day they could log onto a website and download the album. So you see, as per billboards logic that applies to ANY artist those sales were counted because people actually WANTED the album.
It also went number 1 world wide. That bundle deal was only available in the US.
I didn't say Mariah doing that commercial was a bad thing, did I? - I was simply listing what she's been up to but the fact you took it as a negative perfectly illustrates a point in regards to TV commercials, doesn't it?
At the end of the day everything I said was the truth in that respect. Don't be mad about it.
She
HAS been in a weight loss commercial
She
DOES work in reality TV
Her last hit
DIDN'T hit the top ten.
BTW relevance isn't always positive.
Madonna being constantly relevant has a lot to do with her detractors (one doesn’t become such an important cultural icon with a bunch of yes-men around). Take her Olympia Gig for example:
On the YouTube page her show was broadcast, thousands of people clicked on the “dislike” button even before the show began. Yeah, that’s right. Even before Madonna went on stage, thousands of anti-Madonna people took the time to log on to YouTube (increasing the number of people viewing the event) to simply to “dislike” a show that hadn’t even started. And that is the greatest proof of her relevance: At this day and age, people are so preoccupied with Madonna, that they feel the need to express their distaste/dislike for whatever she is doing, even BEFORE she does anything.
But that's not the only thing that happened that night:
Extreme Right French people did not like Madonna’s opinion on Xenophobic Marine Le Pen. So what did they do? They turned up to her show with signs calling her awful names, booed and threw bottles on the stage.
You see, protests happen around/about icons that share a meaningful relation with the issue being dealt with. For instance, protests regarding the Economy happen in front of economic icons (such as Wall Street); Gay Marriage protests happen in front of iconic places where decisions regarding the issue are made: in front of a Church, or Capitol Hill, for example.
Now, Madonna’s concert is the place where people go to protest against whatever she stands for, whether politically, socially or as a cultural icon.
So lamb. When political protests happen around your fave and her work, come back. We'll talk relevance then.