she's an entertainer. Not everyone in the industry is about trying to be a super artistic person. For someone who's a "tool" she has came up with everything that is iconic about her. Music video plots, outfits, dancing, etc. it's not always about how avant garde I can be.
wait for it...
Quote:
Originally posted by man*****
Cue them automated "she's not a singer..an entertainer" rebuttals.
Quote:
Originally posted by RajibDavid
That article is really sad. All those reasons are pathetic.
The only potential reason is her dancing her ass off, but she doesn't.
But wait, it got better.. she's moving her arms more hard and more precise. *that gif is old*
Lipping at an award show is fine. Lipping on TOUR? For your fans? Who pay money to see you? A rip off. And even when those said artists lipped, they at least had the decency not to lip to the album vocals
so basically her show has become an expensive drag show???
I think that people forget she is a singer first, if you wanna see dancers or lipsyncers, there's tons that do a way better job than her in their sleep. TRUTH!
I honestly don't care if she sings live or not. I just love her performance skills & the production of her shows. Although, it would be a bonus if she sang, at least, her ballads live.
so basically her show has become an expensive drag show???
I think that people forget she is a singer first, if you wanna see dancers or lipsyncers, there's tons that do a way better job than her in their sleep. TRUTH!
But are they Britney Spears? If not then they can stay flopping in their local barrios.
I don't mind the lip syncing at all. What bothers me is that she lip syncs to the studio version of her songs instead of a pre-recorded track like EVERY other pop girl does to simulate that they sing live.
She puts on a great show, lip syncing or not... But I personally can't have the same respect for her as a performer as I do for those who do sing live.
