|
Video Games: Wii U slaying Japan, tracking ahead of PS3
Member Since: 3/15/2013
Posts: 9,153
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Wafflinson
You are so full of crap
Gamecube itself was significantly ahead of ps2 (was give and take with original xbox)......
|
And with the disc limitations could the GameCube actually produce the same quality graphics as the Ps2 or X-Box? A quick google search would say not.
Just because something has better hardware, doesn't mean it can actually produce better quality.
|
|
|
Member Since: 2/6/2012
Posts: 29,767
|
Quote:
Originally posted by gloamingtheplain
And with the disc limitations could the GameCube actually produce the same quality graphics as the Ps2 or X-Box? A quick google search would say not.
Just because something has better hardware, doesn't mean it can actually produce better quality.
|
Lies, lies, and more lies.
Just look at Resident Evil 4. One of the most iconic games of all time.
Looked, played, and was significantly better on Gamecube than ps2.
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/15/2013
Posts: 9,153
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Wafflinson
Lies, lies, and more lies.
Just look at Resident Evil 4. One of the most iconic games of all time.
Looked, played, and was significantly better on Gamecube than ps2.
|
If you read what I said earlier, I said that only exclusives looked better on the GameCube
RE4 was a GameCube exclusive until they ported it too the PS2 and others.
With games that are individually developed for each platform, the GameCube always had the worst.
With GameCube exclusives, they are work with the 1.5 limit in mind which means they can use more textures because they build the from the ground up and structure the game around the storage limitations (like they did with the N64).
|
|
|
Member Since: 2/6/2012
Posts: 29,767
|
You are essentially making things up at this point
It has LONG been the consensus that PS2 in general had the worst looking games
You desperately trying to rewrite history........
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/18/2013
Posts: 12,079
|
Quote:
Originally posted by gloamingtheplain
The facts are there, but you're twisting them.
If Nintendo underperformed with the N64, flopped with the GC, did slightly better than the PS3 & 360 and flopped with the Wii U, BUT slayed with the Gameboy, GameBoy colour, GameBoy advance, DS & 3DS, where do you think Nintendo gets it's coins from?
And btw I have a DS & Wii. Plus I still use my original NES weekly.
I don't actually have a deep passion of hatred against other consoles.
I play games. Like normal humans.
|
Then why are you intent on calling Nintendo a flop during these various eras when the FACTS remain that Nintendo was earning way above Microsoft and Sony (and other competition) during all points?
Stop trying to act like you "play all video games" when you clearly have a bias against Nintendo that prevents you from reading the facts as they are.
Once again, NINTENDO earned more money (understatement) than Sony and Microsoft. THEY CANNOT FLOP WHILE EARNING MORE THAN COMPETITION. That just makes no sense. So, realize, Nintendo will remain and continue on even while (according to you) flopping so many times in a row.
Give it up. The numbers don't change just because you don't care for Nintendo as much as you do Sony or Microsoft.
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/18/2013
Posts: 12,079
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Wafflinson
You are essentially making things up at this point
It has LONG been the consensus that PS2 in general had the worst looking games
You desperately trying to rewrite history........
|
And that's a fact.
Power during that gen was
Xbox > Gamecube >>>> PS2
You cannot keep trying to change proven facts because your bias agsinst Nintendo.
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/15/2013
Posts: 9,153
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Flare
Then why are you intent on calling Nintendo a flop during these various eras when the FACTS remain that Nintendo was earning way above Microsoft and Sony (and other competition) during all points?
Stop trying to act like you "play all video games" when you clearly have a bias against Nintendo that prevents you from reading the facts as they are.
Once again, NINTENDO earned more money (understatement) than Sony and Microsoft. THEY CANNOT FLOP WHILE EARNING MORE THAN COMPETITION. That just makes no sense. So, realize, Nintendo will remain and continue on even while (according to you) flopping so many times in a row.
Give it up. The numbers don't change just because you don't care for Nintendo as much as you do Sony or Microsoft.
|
I'm not bias against Nintendo, what part of "I own more Nintendo products than any other" do you not understand?
My argument was, Nintendo hasn't been the king of home consoles, but instead slays at handhelds.
I'm actually defending Nintendo if you actually understood. My point is that even if Nintendo isn't good selling the Wii U, they haven't been a home gaming company since the 80' and that unless they start flopping with handhelds then there is nothing to worry about.
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/15/2013
Posts: 9,153
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Flare
And that's a fact.
Power during that gen was
Xbox > Gamecube >>>> PS2
You cannot keep trying to change proven facts because your bias agsinst Nintendo.
|
I'm not.
CLEARLY, judging by the pictures of non-GameCube exclusives the GameCube had the worst graphics, I brought in MULTIPLE pictures to show this.
If a game was being built for the GameCube with storage limits in mind, of course it's going to build a game using the most out of the hardware. But if most game companies had to LOWER the resolution and CUT DOWN the textures just to get the same game to work on GC, than that's evidence itself.
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/15/2013
Posts: 9,153
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Wafflinson
You are essentially making things up at this point
It has LONG been the consensus that PS2 in general had the worst looking games
You desperately trying to rewrite history........
|
Am I?
How am I making things up? I showed you pictures and you said "um look at RE4" which was a GameCube exclusive,
I could show you some PS2 exclusive games that were mistaken for PS3 games before they were announced for the PS2 in 2006.
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/18/2013
Posts: 12,079
|
Quote:
Originally posted by gloamingtheplain
I'm not bias against Nintendo, what part of "I own more Nintendo products than any other" do you not understand?
My argument was, Nintendo hasn't been the king of home consoles, but instead slays at handhelds.
I'm actually defending Nintendo if you actually understood. My point is that even if Nintendo isn't good selling the Wii U, they haven't been a home gaming company since the 80' and that unless they start flopping with handhelds then there is nothing to worry about.
|
They are the king of home consoles though unless they lose Wii U and a future gen. They have multiple highest software sales entries for their "flop" home consoles. Having those records require a high install base to sell to which they succeed in every gen. SNES to Wii U, they've done it time and time again. Additionally, who is the king of home consoles if not Nintendo? As far as I know, they won NES, SNES and Wii (aka last gen) while outlasting multiple home consoles.
Sony only won PS2. Microsoft won none. So, if winning 3 gens isn't enough proof then you're just being biased. You can own Nintendo products and still not care for them. I have/had PS2, Xbox and Xbox 360 but I do not specifically care for their company's success. I just like certain games that were worth getting for each. So, I don't want to hear that "I can't dislike Nintendo!!1! I bought a Nintendo thing that flopped and is a piece of **** but I like them!!1"
Lastly, your other post is straight up OPINIONS. It's fine if YOU think the Gamecube had ugly graphics but at the end of the day it was MORE powerful than PS2 and closer to Xbox in power. That's a PROVEN FACT. You cannot change facts. Stop trying to just because you're wrong and have no real way to justify your OPINIONS.
Now, I'm done with you. Clearly, you don't listen to facts so, there's no point in talking to you about facts with receipts since you're going to still be delusional.
|
|
|
Member Since: 10/3/2010
Posts: 50,276
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 12/15/2009
Posts: 23,385
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Wafflinson
You are essentially making things up at this point
It has LONG been the consensus that PS2 in general had the worst looking games
You desperately trying to rewrite history........
|
Considering that at the time of the ps2 release the game didn't push the system to its core. The came cube version is better because the developers had Allot of time to enhance the graphics and tweak the imperfections. Obviously. I mean they could had released it again on ps2 with the same enhancements but it wouldn't have made sense.
Blame it on bad porting
|
|
|
Member Since: 2/9/2012
Posts: 10,283
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 10/3/2010
Posts: 50,276
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Brite Lites ☆
|
I screamed at how true this is.
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/3/2010
Posts: 26,013
|
Yass this thread still going on
Also, Kingdom Hearts 2 graphics >>>>> any GameCrap game
|
|
|
Member Since: 12/15/2009
Posts: 23,385
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Brite Lites ☆
|
Poor that.
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/15/2013
Posts: 9,153
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Flare
They are the king of home consoles though unless they lose Wii U and a future gen. They have multiple highest software sales entries for their "flop" home consoles. Having those records require a high install base to sell to which they succeed in every gen. SNES to Wii U, they've done it time and time again. Additionally, who is the king of home consoles if not Nintendo? As far as I know, they won NES, SNES and Wii (aka last gen) while outlasting multiple home consoles.
Sony only won PS2. Microsoft won none. So, if winning 3 gens isn't enough proof then you're just being biased. You can own Nintendo products and still not care for them. I have/had PS2, Xbox and Xbox 360 but I do not specifically care for their company's success. I just like certain games that were worth getting for each. So, I don't want to hear that "I can't dislike Nintendo!!1! I bought a Nintendo thing that flopped and is a piece of **** but I like them!!1"
Lastly, your other post is straight up OPINIONS. It's fine if YOU think the Gamecube had ugly graphics but at the end of the day it was MORE powerful than PS2 and closer to Xbox in power. That's a PROVEN FACT. You cannot change facts. Stop trying to just because you're wrong and have no real way to justify your OPINIONS.
Now, I'm done with you. Clearly, you don't listen to facts so, there's no point in talking to you about facts with receipts since you're going to still be delusional.
|
Sony won PS1 as well, but whatever. I'm not going to justify myself when I own like 12 Nintendo devices and like 4 PS ones. FYI, I've collected Nintendo since I was 5.
Nintendo have said themselves, it's not about the visuals it's about the experience which was the whole point of the Wii, DS etc.
You're not reading sh*t btw. I agreed that CG had better hardware, but it didn't have the space.
RE4 was quite a small game in comparison it others, so it was able to have really good graphics.
But have you even looked at the GameCube's really big games? Like Super Mario Sunshine?
Even Nintendo themselves had to lower the resolution and texture quality to make a full size Mario game. If the GameCube used full sized DVDs it would be better than the PS2 all round. But unless you play a game with around 10 levels or levels that have small environments rather than open ones (RE4) than overall the GameCube had poorer graphics.
Pictures do not lie. You can refer to a hardware spec sheet all you like.
Anyway, if you're a Nintendo Stan you shouldn't be worried about graphics anyway. Who the **** cares about graphics when playing gems like Mario or Pokemon?
|
|
|
Member Since: 12/15/2009
Posts: 23,385
|
since when do Nintendo fans brag about hardware?? what do they have to show for it? Gamecube! the 2nd biggest Nintendo flop after the Wii U!
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/15/2013
Posts: 9,153
|
Quote:
Originally posted by man*****
since when do Nintendo fans brag about hardware?? what do they have to show for it? Gamecube! the 2nd biggest Nintendo flop after the Wii U!
|
Exactly. Why brag about hardware when it's obviously not it's selling point. It's the experience.
Wii doesn't have PS3 or 360 graphics, but it sold because of the experience.
The DS was nowhere close to the PSP but sold because of the experience.
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/6/2012
Posts: 15,374
|
Quote:
Originally posted by man*****
since when do Nintendo fans brag about hardware?? what do they have to show for it? Gamecube! the 2nd biggest Nintendo flop after the Wii U!
|
right? that poor company decided to stick with its crap hardware last gen and now they are struggling to catch up due to the GP being over its gimmicks
|
|
|
|
|