This is UK numbers, flop journalist comparing it to Gaga and Katy's US numbers.

I read in the comments that it shifted 6400 in the UK, not the States, that the article compared UK and US numbers. 6400 for the UK’s first day isn’t bad...

uk numbers

These are UK numbers (expected #s from there) not US..

They can't tell the U.K. from the U.S.?

Which would make it even more impressive for UK in comparison to Fungism

I just saw that these are UK numbers which they ain't bad, considering other pop girls did like 10k more with #1 hits...

This is false and should be deleted. These are UK numbers.

That author is stupid, those are UK sales.

The "person" who wrote this "article" is, besides being unprofessional and disrespectful as hell, dumb as ****, since he/she/it apparently thinks "US = UK".

Wait, yes, the writer got me confused, HOW did he think this was a good comparison? Comparing Britney's first week UK sales to the other girls' first week US sales?

He tried it tho.

People were ready to SNATCH & SCALP if this was true.

Someone clock this bitch

The poorest of journalism.