|
Poll: Bigger at her peak: Britney or Gaga?
View Poll Results: Who was bigger: Britney or Gaga?
|
Britney Spears
|
|
303 |
83.47% |
Lady Gaga
|
|
60 |
16.53% |
Member Since: 4/25/2011
Posts: 41,661
|
Lol at the "album inflation"
There's no such thing and that's the dumbest thing I've ever read in this site.
If we adjust revenue (money which is what inflation is all about) Britney still wins. And NOT that inflation not inflating the gross of Britney's tour when it is the only justifiable inflation. Keep being delusional. It's funny and embarrassing to watch
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/22/2011
Posts: 9,429
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Nonchalant
I mean one could argue pretty strongly that Britney's peak was higher and bigger than Madonna's peak
|
Eeeh IDK about that
___________
Anyways it's hard to compare because it is two different eras I was old enough to see and remember both. But I gotta give it to Brit that was insane at her peak, like goddamn chick RAN the industry
Quote:
Originally posted by Musicjunky318
Oh Britney Spears at her peak was something else. Every girl, white girl at least, wanted to be her every guy wanted to be with her. It's a phenomenon I haven't seen since she debuted and she's possibly the only sole, save Madonna, to ever have it on a grand scale. Two Diamond albums back to back, dolls, her relationship with Middle America, toying the lines between virginal and vamp, she was dating Justin Timberlake, lead singer of one of the biggest boy bands, instant press on anything she did, her hair, her crop-tops, her jeans, her belly-ring were all monitored and discussed, etc.
Gaga's reign was cute but Britney's was a whole other level.
|
Nahh I would say Whitney and Mariah had it on a huge grand scale too but that's just my opinion
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/6/2012
Posts: 8,639
|
Britney was obviously a massive phenomenon... and most people would probably consider her the bigger pop star. But her rise was so attached to the larger teen pop wave. I feel that Gaga was more a singular force of nature - when she arrived she altered the sound of pop radio and how modern pop stars dress, brand and market themselves. After she took over, everyone else was just trying to catch up. I would also say that Gaga was able to capture an even more global, diverse audience of people old and young, straight and gay, from every color/faith/background/etc. Just my two cents.
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/5/2011
Posts: 1,309
|
Lol. During the 90s, Boybands and alternative were very popular. Then came Britney and soon, teen female artists spurted out.
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/18/2012
Posts: 14,652
|
Quote:
Originally posted by PoisonPill
Britney was obviously a massive phenomenon... and most people would probably consider her the bigger pop star. But her rise was so attached to the larger teen pop wave. I feel that Gaga was more a singular force of nature - when she arrived she altered the sound of pop radio and how modern pop stars dress, brand and market themselves. After she took over, everyone else was just trying to catch up. I would also say that Gaga was able to capture an even more global, diverse audience of people old and young, straight and gay, from every color/faith/background/etc. Just my two cents.
|
Altered pop sound? Okay then
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/18/2013
Posts: 8,633
|
Scepter, you really do hate Britney don't you?
|
|
|
Member Since: 9/1/2013
Posts: 17,161
|
Baby One More Time can slay Gaga's career(no h8). HAPPY BIRTHDAY BRITNEY ! I LOVE YOU SO MUCH !
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/19/2013
Posts: 998
|
dddddddddd @ 209 vs 50
Britney obvi
|
|
|
Member Since: 6/24/2012
Posts: 24,708
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Scepter
Nsync started out in 1997. Britney started out opening for them and being closely affiliated with them. Would her career have gone the same if weren't for Nsync and if she didn't date Justin? Absolutely not. And the UK was not her primary market; her singles might have charted higher in the UK, but the UK was definitely not her primary market.
if Britney was the first teen popstar to use sex to sell, she was just going along with trend Madonna started and Janet picked up on, Britney's age is arbitrary. Xtina isn't the first pop vocalist either; just because she became the youngest since Celine doesn't mean she invented it.
Google was nothing compared to what is it now. Do a simple look at the company's timeline. It only started out 3 years before 2001. TRL is a much more valid point than Google search lol. And yes I remember how big she was there and how she had to share the spotlight with Legend X. Gaga resigned supreme in 2009, Katy paled in comparison then.
The result that show when I look it up are just puns after puns.
What could possibly be more memorable about Oops than the red bodysuit?
If you're using her current state to drag her peak than you should know that Britney's current state is far worse. We'll see how BJ sells this week. Britney is more powerful in 12 years or her 12th year? Either is wrong because Britney has never grossed more than TFBall, let alone BTW Ball, and Britney was always behind in everything since Gaga started out. (TF> Circus, TF singles > circus singles, BTW > FF, BTW singles > FF singles, gaga tours > britney tours)
Gaga's success declined, but she is not irrelevant. She's not that far ahead of behind Katy. Irrelevance is flopping with 3 solo singles in a row, and an album soon.
Sis, it was obvious you were done when you resorted to ATRL poll results for support. Gaga had the bigger peak and you know it.
you tried tho
|
How old are you? 12 or 14? Your posts are the epitome of delusion.
Anyway, more than 250 users think Britney's impact is WAY BIGGER THAN 45 users that think Gaga's is bigger. You tried, tho.
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/18/2013
Posts: 8,633
|
Quote:
Originally posted by abrahamjmr
How old are you? 12 or 14? Your posts are the epitome of delusion.
Anyway, more than 250 users think Britney's impact is WAY BIGGER THAN 45 users that think Gaga's is bigger. You tried, tho.
|
Right? I had to give up during the argument because he was just too difficult. I bet if there was a thread made if Jessica Simpson or Britney was bigger, he'll find a way to make it Jessica seem bigger
|
|
|
Member Since: 6/24/2012
Posts: 24,708
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Brinny Baby
Right? I had to give up during the argument because he was just too difficult. I bet if there was a thread made if Jessica Simpson or Britney was bigger, he'll find a way to make it Jessica seem bigger
|
Funniest thing about the whole argument is his avi. I mean, he is supposed to be a Britney follower. He should be 12 years and I bet he wasn't even born when Britney was a HUGE WORLDWIDE FORCE no one could compete.
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/19/2013
Posts: 2,776
|
the seething
I know how much you stans love clinging onto her past. Sorry, but Gaga eclipsed her legacy.
Gaga's peak album sales > Britney's
gaga's peak tour gross > britney's
gaga's peak impact in pop culture > britney's
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/18/2013
Posts: 8,633
|
Quote:
Originally posted by abrahamjmr
Funniest thing about the whole argument is his avi. I mean, he is supposed to be a Britney follower. He should be 12 years and I bet he wasn't even born when Britney was a HUGE WORLDWIDE FORCE no one could compete.
|
No, he's actually an obsessed Britney hater. You can read Legend X inside the heart instead of Britney Jean.
Anyway, everyone in this thread knows the answer is Britney so that's that.
|
|
|
Member Since: 6/24/2012
Posts: 24,708
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Scepter
the seething
I know how much you stans love clinging onto her past. Sorry, but Gaga eclipsed her legacy.
Gaga's peak album sales > Britney's
gaga's peak tour gross > britney's
gaga's peak impact in pop culture > britney's
|
If that makes you sleep, you're free to keep believing it.
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/19/2013
Posts: 2,776
|
the facts are on my side
you can keep this poll
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/18/2013
Posts: 8,633
|
^Everyone's opinions in this thread >>>>>>>>>>>>>> your biased pressed opinion. Deal with it.
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/18/2013
Posts: 12,079
|
Let's be real, landslides in a ATRL poll usually point towards the truth. You almost never can get that many stans to solely agree on something (or someone) that a lot of them don't even care for, if it wasn't somewhat true.
Britney was WAY bigger at her peak. You wouldn't understand if you grew up in the late 2000s where Britney's image completely changed towards the poster child for popstar/former Disney kid gone wrong (despite releasing Circus and still being somewhat on top of her game towards Femme Fatale). So, it's understandable for a younger user to say Gaga. Just know, Britney was a lot bigger and a lot more important to pop music in her peak than Gaga. Gaga did her thing in 09/10 but it's clear that effect fell off. Meanwhile, Britney held a choke-hold on pop music for years after her peak. That's how powerful it was.
|
|
|
Member Since: 4/12/2011
Posts: 3,104
|
Britney was EVERYWHERE on EVERYTHING.
Britney definitely was bigger, way bigger.
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/6/2011
Posts: 26,891
|
Well... ATRL polls don't lie
|
|
|
Member Since: 4/16/2011
Posts: 1,740
|
Quote:
Originally posted by SebaMonster
Gaga debuted with 1M in 2011, Britney debuted with 1M in 2000, so Gaga I guess.
|
Lol how 1.320 mil became 1 mil?
|
|
|
|
|