Quote:
Originally posted by North & South
@chartnews
Billboard 200: #6 @Kelly_Clarkson, Wrapped In Red 43,000 (113,000 total).
|
Not mad at all that Avril edged Kelly. Good for Avril and Kelly still gave amazing sales.
BTW, it seems that both Stronger and GH-C1 fell off the chart after last week's boom.

I can't see either of them at least...
Quote:
Originally posted by Cupid
She's gonna get snatched by Buble and the Duck people this year 
|
Don't even say that!
Quote:
Originally posted by jpsketch
Yeah, it's totally the opposite. Folks are starting later.
20, 30, 40, etc years ago someone my age (25) would have been married with 3 kids by now.
Heck, my mom had me at 20.
|
Didn't you say some time ago that you were 18?

Or were you joking and I was the only one who didn't noticed that you were pulling his/her leg?
To the topic, Kelly is in perfect age to have babies (I would prefer to have them at like 27/29 tho) if she wants them. She isn't getting any younger. I can see why Adele thinks what she thinks, she's young(er than Kelly) and now she has less freedom and more responsability. Why Kelly wouldn't be able to have both a baby and her career if she wanted to? Look at Pink.
My parents had me when they were 23 and 24 respectively. But now I think people tend to have babies in their 30s. Out of my friends only one (who's 20) has a baby. I think rather people with lower education (no offense to anyone!) have people at such a young age in developed countries. Here in the Czech Republic there has been for some years a problem that the population is getting older and older and there aren't enough children. Like at primary schools, high schools and universities, right now there definitely aren't as many students as there could have been. Let's say that 100 students can study somewhere but there are only 62 ones because there isn't enough of them.