This.

They probably got in the studio and she played some stuff for Britney, and then she said "that one!" and then they worked on making it relevant to her.

Songwriters have said FOR YEARS how Britney #1 Never tries to claim credit for things she didn't do and #2 That she does change some stuff with lyrics, but never asks for credit.

We all know Britney probably only changed a few words so she could get a writing credit like Bey has done in the past.

Out!

Her father controls all her affairs. That's what a conservator does. She wasn't placed under the conservatorship because she was spending her money poorly, she was placed under the conservatorship because she was being reckless and endangering herself and others (it's the same reason why Amanda Bynes wasn't placed under a conservatorship until she committed a property crime). Now that she's ostensibly no longer a danger to either herself or others, there's no valid reason to keep her under the conservatorship and her father is essentially abusing his power over her in order to get as much money out of her as possible.
That article cited plenty of info from back during the Circus era, too. Whatever was going on with Britney during the Femme Fatale era was going on before that era, too, and discrediting the article solely because it says "Would You Hold It Against Me" is immature and ridiculous. The rest of the article is well cited and well reasoned and I find it's silly that you're going to write it off just because of a small misprint with a song title. If you'd just take off your stan glasses you'd see the truth.

You're right on that count, I admit. After doing some checking, every other article that referenced Britney not being allowed to use the Internet has cited that same RadarOnline article and having done some digging I see now that RadarOnline is not a reliable source. I'll edit that part out. I still doubt Britney posts anything on her Twitter but it's really no more than a hunch, so

Sure, that means she's never tried to stick writing credits onto songs she didn't write at all. Doesn't mean she's not made changes to songs and got a writing credit that way.

Britney's never cared about writing credits in the past but I can see her team trying to fix up something like this this era because that's what they're really marketing this album on - it being "personal."

Why are there all these conspiracies? She's had "personal" songs (aka ballads, as most ATRLers see it) both with and without any writing credit. imo she's always been very transparent about how much or how little she is involved, both in interviews and from the liner notes.

I mean... come on. She has blatantly lip-synced almost her entire career without any shame. I don't see why that wouldn't translate to writing: she'll admit when she does and doesn't.

She probably reconstructed the lyrics and Sia wouldn't say how THEY wrote the lyrics if Britney only changed a word or two.

Not a member of the Britney base actually discreting Britney's writing talent. Like ****ing really? WHAT THE HELL WOULD BRITNEY GET OUT OF STEALING WRITING CREDITS? are you dense?

Britney isn't fake like these other pop stars you've mentioned. She's not going to take credit for something she hasn't done.

I saw the article when it first came out. What these people fail to realize is that Britney came up with the original concepts for "Circus" and "Femme Fatale." She was the one who wanted to comeback and she was the one who had an idea for the follow-up. Her main grievance with "Femme Fatale" was that her release date was forced and so was her sound. Her dad couldn't possibly have forced "FF" since he's not the president of JIVE, and JIVE only made her release because they were folding and she still owed them a studio album and remix album according to contract (hence why B In the Mix 2 was just thrown out there). Britney wasn't happy because they rushed her album release and wanted a more commercial, safe sound so they could make a quick buck, which is not what Britney's about. It's simple mistakes like that that are why I don't trust this article from someone who claims to have been a huge fan of Britney but doesn't know squat about her.

You can definitely tell the difference between Britney's Tweets and Adam's. Britney's are a lot more tragic and usually involve something dorky about her personal interests and don't include iTunes links at the end :lol: Adam/Larry make it more than clear when they Tweet. Also, will.i.am confirmed that he's seen Britney Tweet, though I wouldn't doubt that Britney sometimes tells people what to Tweet and lets them do it for her every now and again. She is a 32 year-old athletic mother of two, so it's not like Twitter is where she'd want to spend most of her time.

Exactly. If she really cared about portraying a certain image, would she really go to Walmart regularly in normal people clothes?

Yes. But you claimed that she would have only changed words to get the credit. If she changed words, it wouldn't be for credit.

The Beyonce credits are about getting the publishing munies.

She also said Britney was a personal album, yet she only wrote four songs. Same for Circus and she wrote 2. The GP doesn't care about songwriting credits. The only reason to steal or change a few words to get credit is to get publishing. That's all. And it's proven that Britney doesn't care about that in the past.

no cuz she's not asking writing credits when she re-done like one word or smth

britney probably changed the lyrics. IDK why they would try and steal writing credits now when they didn't even remotely bother for her other 7 albums

Sia wrote "Blank Page" which happened to be on Christina's "Lotus" and the demo and the final version are pretty different. They just kept the chorus the same.